Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34250555›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2021

Prognosis and Chemotherapy Use in Breast Cancer Patients with Multiple Lymphatic Micrometastases: An NCDB Analysis.

Roi Weiser, Efstathia Polychronopoulou, Waqar Haque, Sandra S Hatch, Jing He, Suimin Qiu, Avi Markowitz, William J Gradishar, Yong-Fang Kuo, V Suzanne Klimberg

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Comparison of two hybrid sentinel node tracers: indocyanine green (ICG)-European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Roi WeiserDepartment of Surgery, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA. roiweiser@yahoo.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4522-6404
Efstathia PolychronopoulouDepartment of Preventive Medicine and Population Health, Office of Biostatistics, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA.
Waqar HaqueDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USA.
Sandra S HatchDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA.
Jing HeDepartment of Pathology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA.
Suimin QiuDepartment of Pathology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA.
Avi MarkowitzDivision of Hematology/Oncology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA.
William J GradisharDepartment of Medicine and Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.
Yong-Fang KuoDepartment of Preventive Medicine and Population Health, Office of Biostatistics, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA.
V Suzanne KlimbergDepartment of Surgery, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA. vsklimbe@utmb.edu.
The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston · USMethodist Hospital · USNorthwestern University · USThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe number of involved lymph nodes negatively affects prognosis in breast cancer patients. Nevertheless, current staging and treatment recommendations do not distinguish between patients with single versus multiple lymphatic micrometastases. In this study, we aim to better characterize these patients.

methodsThe National Cancer Database was retrospectively queried to identify 486,800 women with stage I-III, estrogen receptor-positive/progesterone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (ER+/PR+/HER2-) breast cancer and nodal status of N0, N1mi with 1 (Nmic1) or more (Nmic > 1) involved nodes, and N1 with 1 involved node (N1.1), from 2010 to 2016. Patients with different nodal statuses were compared regarding treatment characteristics, survival, and benefit from chemotherapy by their 21-gene recurrence score (RS).

resultsOf the 23,072 N1mi patients, 88.3% were Nmic1 and 11.7% were Nmic > 1. Nmic > 1 patients were younger, had larger and higher-grade tumors, with more lymphovascular invasion, and were more commonly treated by axillary dissection, radiation, and chemotherapy than Nmic1 patients. In that, they were comparable with N1.1 patients. Five-year survival of Nmic > 1 patients (88.1%) was worse than Nmic1 patients (90.1%; p = 0.02), but similar to N1.1 patients (87.9%). Nmic1, Nmic > 1, and N1.1 patients with RS 11-25 exhibited a < 2% absolute survival benefit associated with chemotherapy. With RS > 25, Nmic > 1 patients showed a 3.5% benefit, similar to Nmic1 (4.8%) and lower than N1.1 (10.9%) patients.

conclusionsNmic > 1 breast cancer patients have worse prognoses than Nmic1 patients, similar to N1.1 patients. Our data suggest those patients with RS 11-25 have minimal benefit from chemotherapy. These findings should be taken into account when discussing prognosis and considering chemotherapy in patients with lymphatic micrometastases.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsFemaleHumansLymphatic MetastasisNeoplasm MicrometastasisNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplasm StagingPrognosisRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID34250555
OpenAlexW3182849011

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.