ArticleJCO precision oncology2021
Validation of ctDNA Quality Control Materials Through a Precompetitive Collaboration of the Foundation for the National Institutes of Health.
Article in JCO precision oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Circulating Tumor DNA as a Biomarker for Precision Medicine in Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Pooled it
- The role of serologic biomarkers "liquid biopsy" in the fight against breast cancer: From biological foundations to clinical impact.iScience · 2026Review
- Early circulating tumor DNA dynamics predict fruquintinib efficacy in refractory metastatic colorectal cancer before imaging.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Generic Protocols for Analytical Validation of Tumor-Informed Circulating Tumor DNA Assays for Molecular Residual Disease: The Blood Profiling Atlas in Cancer's Molecular Residual Disease Analytical Validation Working Group Consensus Recommendation.JCO precision oncology · 2026Article
- Functional Characterization and a Real-World Clinical Laboratory Pilot of the Foundation for the National Institutes of Health Circulating Tumor DNA Quality Control Materials.JCO precision oncology · 2025Article
- Variability of Circulating Tumor DNA Levels in Plasma Samples From Patients With Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer in the Absence of Treatment.JCO precision oncology · 2025Article
- The role of circulating tumor DNA in melanomas of the uveal tract.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Review
- Validation of a Molecular Diagnostic Test for Circulating Tumor DNA by Next-Gen Sequencing.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Circulating tumor DNA in clinical trials for solid tumors: Challenges and current applications.The journal of liquid biopsy · 2023Review
- Clinical Testing for Tumor Cell-Free DNA: College of American Pathologists Proficiency Programs Reveal Practice Trends.Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine · 2023Article
- Liquid biopsy approaches to capture tumor evolution and clinical outcomes during cancer immunotherapy.Journal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2023Review
- Recommendations related to the analytical equivalence assessment of gene panel testing.Cancer science · 2022Review
- Reporting on circulating tumor DNA monitoring in metastatic cancer-From clinical validity to clinical utility.Cancer · 2022Article
- PARP Inhibitor Applicability: Detailed Assays for Homologous Recombination Repair Pathway Components.OncoTargets and therapy · 2022Review
- Molecular Mechanism of EGFR-TKI Resistance inCancers · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We report the results from a Foundation for the National Institutes of Health Biomarkers Consortium project to address the absence of well-validated quality control materials (QCMs) for circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) testing. This absence is considered a cause of variance and inconsistencies in translating ctDNA results into clinical actions.
methodsIn this phase I study, QCMs with 14 clinically relevant mutations representing single nucleotide variants, insertions or deletions (indels), translocations, and copy number variants were sourced from three commercial manufacturers with variant allele frequencies (VAFs) of 5%, 2.5%, 1%, 0.1%, and 0%. Four laboratories tested samples in quadruplicate using two allele-specific droplet digital polymerase chain reaction and three (amplicon and hybrid capture) next-generation sequencing (NGS) panels.
resultsThe two droplet digital polymerase chain reaction assays reported VAF values very close to the manufacturers' claimed concentrations for all QCMs. NGS assays reported most single nucleotide variants and indels, but not translocations, close to the expected VAF values. Notably, two NGS assays reported lower VAF than expected for all translocations in all QCM mixtures, possibly related to technical challenges detecting these variants. The ability to call
conclusionThese results support the utility of the QCM in testing ctDNA assay analytical performance. However, unique designs and manufacturing methods for the QCM, and variations in a laboratory's testing configuration, may require testing of multiple QCMs to find the best reagents for accurate result interpretation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.