Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34250300›Full record

ArticleJournal of veterinary research2021

Canine Leishmaniasis Prevalence in the Slovenian Dog Population.

Tina Kotnik, Javier Moreno, Barbara Šoba, Brane Krt, Miha Skvarč, Aleksandra Vergles Rataj, Maja Gorišek Bajc, Urša Ravnik Verbič

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of veterinary research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Journal of veterinary research · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Tina KotnikSmall Animal Clinic, Veterinary Faculty, University of Ljubljana, SI-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Javier MorenoWHO Collaborating Centre for Leishmaniasis Institute of Health Carlos III (ISCIII), Majadahonda, 228220 Madrid, Spain.
Barbara ŠobaInstitute of Microbiology and Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, SI-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Brane KrtInstitute of Microbiology and Parasitology, Veterinary Faculty, University of Ljubljana, SI-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Miha SkvarčGeneral Hospital Jesenice, Cesta maršala Tita 112, 4270 Jesenice, Slovenia.
Aleksandra Vergles RatajInstitute of Microbiology and Parasitology, Veterinary Faculty, University of Ljubljana, SI-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Maja Gorišek BajcInstitute of Microbiology and Parasitology, Veterinary Faculty, University of Ljubljana, SI-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Urša Ravnik VerbičSmall Animal Clinic, Veterinary Faculty, University of Ljubljana, SI-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionLeishmaniasis is a life-threatening zoonosis of which dogs are the major reservoir and sandflies are the vectors. Until now, the prevalence of canine leishmaniasis (CanL) in the Slovenian dog population was unknown. MATERIAL AND

methodsEpidemiological data, eye swabs and blood samples were taken from 465 dogs born in Slovenia and older than one year. Commercial ELISA kits and real-time PCR were used. For ELISA-positive samples, an immunofluorescence antibody test (IFAT) was performed. Descriptive statistics were used to characterise the samples. The one-sample nonparametric chi-square test was used to test whether the categories of a variable were equally distributed.

resultsA 59.9% proportion of the recruited dogs had travelled to endemic regions and 62.1% of them had not been protected by insect repellents. Skin symptoms that might be CanL-related were described in 109 of the dogs' histories (23.4%), inappetence and/or weight loss in 25 (5.4%), and anaemia, intermittent fever, and/or lymphadenopathy in 19 (4.1%). At the time of recruitment, all dogs were asymptomatic. All samples were PCR negative, nine (1.9%) were ELISA positive, but none were IFAT positive. Five of the nine ELISA-positive dogs were non-travellers.

conclusionWe conclude that the seroprevalence of canine leishmaniasis of 1.9 % in the autochthonous Slovenian dog population may pose a risk of endemic spread of the disease.

Indexed as

canine leishmaniasisCanLdogsprevalencevector-borne diseases

Identifiers

PMID34250300
PMCPMC8256472

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.