Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34250254›Full record

ArticleOpen medicine (Warsaw, Poland)2021

Can exchange transfusion be replaced by double-LED phototherapy?

Shinya Abe, Kazumichi Fujioka

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Open medicine (Warsaw, Poland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Shinya AbeDepartment of Pediatrics, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, 7-5-1 Kusunoki-Cho, Chuo-Ku, Kobe 650-0017, Hyogo, Japan.
Kazumichi FujiokaDepartment of Pediatrics, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, 7-5-1 Kusunoki-Cho, Chuo-Ku, Kobe 650-0017, Hyogo, Japan.
Kobe University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Phototherapy is a conventional treatment for neonatal jaundice and widely considered as a safe procedure. Recent developments in light-emitting diode (LED) phototherapy devices have made more effective treatments possible. Exchange transfusion (ET) is typically applied for cases of refractory severe hyperbilirubinemia despite its risk of various complications. Since the therapeutic effect of phototherapy is correlated with its irradiance, ET may be avoided by performing phototherapy with higher irradiation. Recently, we adopted double-LED phototherapy as a bridging treatment to ET to treat a case of severe hyperbilirubinemia. In this case, the continual increase of bilirubin levels was suppressed immediately after its administration, and ET was not required. Throughout the treatment, no complications or increase in oxidative stress was observed. In addition, neurodevelopment was appropriate for the patient's age at the 1-year follow-up, and no findings of kernicterus, including physical and magnetic resonance imaging findings, were observed. We hypothesized that double-LED phototherapy may be a good treatment strategy to replace ET for infants with severe hyperbilirubinemia; however, further investigations regarding safety issues including acute and long-term complications are needed before clinical adaptation.

Indexed as

bilirubinirradianceLEDneonatal jaundice

Identifiers

PMID34250254
PMCPMC8254572
OpenAlexW3178385638

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.