ArticleTrauma case reports2021
Blunt and penetrating chest trauma with concomitant COVID-19 infections: Two case reports.
Article in Trauma case reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparison of chest CT scan findings between COVID-19 and pulmonary contusion in trauma patients based on RSNA criteria: Established novel criteria for trauma victims.Chinese journal of traumatology = Zhonghua chuang shang za zhi · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWe present two patients: one with a blunt and one with a penetrating chest trauma mechanism and both with concomitant COVID-19 infections.
findingsThe first patient is a 23 year old previously healthy male who presented to a Level 1 trauma center following a motor vehicle collision with blunt chest trauma and respiratory failure. The second patient is a 30 year old previously healthy male who presented to a Level 1 trauma center for a stab wound to the anterior chest with a right ventricular injury. Both patients were incidentally found to be COVID positive. We discuss the impact of COVID positivity on management considerations in these trauma patients.
conclusionConcurrent COVID infection in trauma patients with respiratory failure after pulmonary trauma can obscure the cause of the respiratory failure. At the time of this writing, management of both is similar, COVID-specific therapeutic agents are being investigated, and steroids carry the best evidence. Superimposed bacterial co-infections should be treated. Although timing of tracheostomy is institution-specific, when indicated it is still performed. COVID infection is often associated with a hypercoagulable state in trauma patients who are already at higher thrombotic risk. In keeping with normal practice after hemorrhagic resuscitation in trauma patients, an early aggressive initiation of prophylactic anticoagulation continues to be prudent. The benefit of empiric therapeutic anticoagulation is not yet known.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.