Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34250171›Full record

ReviewOrthopaedic journal of sports medicine2021

Biomechanical Effects of Combined Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction and Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Shayne R Kelly, Brendan M Cutter, Eric G Huish

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07451743 (Are Clinical Outcomes Unchanged by ALL Fixation at 0° or 30° of Knee Flexion in Combined ACL-ALL Reconstruction?), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07451743 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Are Clinical Outcomes Unchanged by ALL Fixation at 0° or 30° of Knee Flexion in Combined ACL-ALL Reconstruction?

TypeinterventionalSponsorASL LecceRan2026 to 2029Enrolled100ConditionsAnterior Cruciate Ligament RuptureArmsanterolateral ligament reconstruction
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Anterolateral complex of the knee: State of the art.World journal of orthopedics · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Shayne R KellySan Joaquin General Hospital, French Camp, California, USA.
Brendan M CutterSan Joaquin General Hospital, French Camp, California, USA.
Eric G HuishSan Joaquin General Hospital, French Camp, California, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCombined anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR) and anterolateral ligament reconstruction (ALLR) are performed with the intention to restore native knee kinematics after ACL tears. There continue to be varying results as to the difference in kinematics between combined and isolated procedures, including anterior tibial translation (ATT) and internal tibial rotation (IR). PURPOSE: To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the kinematic changes of a combined ACLR/ALLR versus isolated ACLR and to assess the effects of different fixation techniques. STUDY

designSystematic review.

methodsWe conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of 15 human cadaveric biomechanical studies evaluating combined ACLR/ALLR versus isolated ACLR and their effects on ATT and IR in 149 specimens. The primary outcomes were ATT and IR. Secondary outcomes included graft type and size as well as fixation methods such as type, angle, tension, and position of fixation. Meta-regression was used to examine the effect of various cofactors on the resulting measures.

resultsCompared with isolated ACLR, combined ACLR/ALLR decreased ATT and IR by 0.01 mm (95% CI, -0.059 to 0.079 mm;

conclusionThese results suggest that a combined ACLR/ALLR procedure significantly decreases IR compared with isolated ACLR, especially at higher knee flexion angles. Semitendinosus ALL graft, fixation at higher knee flexion, increased tensioning, and tibial-sided interference screw fixation in ALLR may help to further reduce IR.

Indexed as

anterolateral ligament reconstructionbiomechanicskinematicsknee

Identifiers

PMID34250171
PMCPMC8237218

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.