ArticleAsia Oceania journal of nuclear medicine & biology2021
Estimation of the lower limits for feasible Ra-223 SPECT imaging: a Monte Carlo simulation study.
Article in Asia Oceania journal of nuclear medicine & biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesRa-223 is a promising radionuclide for the treatment of skeletal metastases in castration-resistant prostate cancer patients. This study aims to estimate the lower limits for feasible Ra-223 single-photon emission computerized tomography (SPECT) imaging using a Monte Carlo simulation study.
methodsThe SPECT images were produced on a homemade code: the Monte Carlo simulation of electrons and photons for SPECT (MCEP-SPECT). The National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA) phantom with six hot spheres of diameters of 37, 28, 22, 17, 13, and 10 mm installed inside, was used. The background activity concentration was 0.6 kBq/mL, and the ratios of hot concentrations to the background (
resultsThe CRC for the HEGP collimator was 35-40%, while the CRC for the MEGP collimator was 25-30%. The CNRs for the MEGP collimator were larger than those for the HEGP collimator. The CNRs of the hot spheres with diameters less than 22 mm were lower than 5.0 for both collimators, when
conclusionsThe MEGP collimator is superior in terms of detectability, while the HEGP collimator is superior in terms of quantitative accuracy. When the lesion size is small, the MEGP collimator may be favorable. Based on these results, the estimated lower limit of the activity concentration would be approximately 1 kBq/mL if the background concentration is 0.05 kBq/mL for a large lesion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.