Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34250002›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in surgery2021

Forensic Implications of Anatomical Education and Surgical Training With Cadavers.

Carmelo Pirri, Carla Stecco, Andrea Porzionato, Rafael Boscolo-Berto, René H Fortelny, Veronica Macchi, Marko Konschake, Stefano Merigliano, Raffaele De Caro

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Virtual reality as a viable alternative to cadaveric dissection for temporal bone surgical training: a pilot crossover trial.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Carmelo PirriDepartment of Neurosciences, Institute of Human Anatomy, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
Carla SteccoDepartment of Neurosciences, Institute of Human Anatomy, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
Andrea PorzionatoDepartment of Neurosciences, Institute of Human Anatomy, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
Rafael Boscolo-BertoDepartment of Neurosciences, Institute of Human Anatomy, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
René H FortelnyMedical Faculty, Sigmund Freud Private University, Vienna, Austria.
Veronica MacchiDepartment of Neurosciences, Institute of Human Anatomy, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
Marko KonschakeDepartment of Anatomy, Histology and Embryology, Institute of Clinical and Functional Anatomy, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Stefano MeriglianoDepartment of Surgery, Center for Esophageal Disease, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University Hospital of Padova, Padua, Italy.
Raffaele De CaroDepartment of Neurosciences, Institute of Human Anatomy, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anatomical education and surgical training with cadavers are usually considered an appropriate method of teaching, above all for all surgeons at various levels. Indeed, in such a way they put into practice and exercise a procedure before performing it live, reducing the learning curve in a safe environment and the risks for the patients. Really, up to now it is not clear if the nonuse of the cadavers for anatomical education and surgical training can have also forensic implications. A substantial literature research was used for this review, based on PubMed and Web of Science database. From this review, it is clear that the cadaveric training could be considered mandatory, both for surgeons and for medical students, leading to a series of questions with forensic implications. Indeed, there are many evidences that a cadaver lab can improve the learning curve of a surgeon, above all in the first part of the curve, in which frequent and severe complications are possible. Consequently, a medical responsibility for residents and surgeons which perform a procedure without adequate training could be advised, but also for hospital, that has to guarantee a sufficient training for its surgeons and other specialists through cadaver labs. Surely, this type of training could help to improve the practical skills of surgeons working in small hospitals, where some procedures are rare. Cadaver studies can permit a better evaluation of safety and efficacy of new surgical devices by surgeons, avoiding using patients as ≪guinea pigs≫. Indeed, a legal responsibility for a surgeon and other specialists could exist in the use of a new device without an apparent regulatory oversight. For a good medical practice, the surgeons should communicate to the patient the unsure procedural risks, making sure the patients' full understanding about the novelty of the procedure and that they have used this technique on few, if any, patients before. Cadaver training could represent a shortcut in the standard training process, increasing both the surgeon learning curve and patient confidence. Forensic clinical anatomy can supervise and support all these aspects of the formation and of the use of cadaver training.

Indexed as

cadaver labforensic clinical anatomyiatrogenic lesionsindividual anatomymedical malpracticerisk management

Identifiers

PMID34250002
PMCPMC8260677

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.