Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34249936›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cell and developmental biology2021

Scaling Laws for Mitotic Chromosomes.

Eric M Kramer, P A Tayjasanant, Bethan Cordone

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cell and developmental biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. First draft genome of the decaploid species,GigaByte (Hong Kong, China) · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Eric M KramerDepartment of Physics, Bard College at Simon's Rock, Great Barrington, MA, United States.
P A TayjasanantDepartment of Physics, Bard College at Simon's Rock, Great Barrington, MA, United States.
Bethan CordoneDepartment of Physics, Bard College at Simon's Rock, Great Barrington, MA, United States.
Bard College at Simon's Rock · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During mitosis in higher eukaryotes, each chromosome condenses into a pair of rod-shaped chromatids. This process is co-regulated by the activity of several gene families, and the underlying biophysics remains poorly understood. To better understand the factors regulating chromosome condensation, we compiled a database of mitotic chromosome size and DNA content from the tables and figures of >200 published papers. A comparison across vertebrate species shows that chromosome width, length and volume scale with DNA content to the powers ∼1/4, ∼1/2, and ∼1, respectively. Angiosperms (flowering plants) show a similar length scaling, so this result is not specific to vertebrates. Chromosome shape and size thus satisfy two conditions: (1) DNA content per unit volume is approximately constant and (2) the cross-sectional area increases proportionately with chromosome length. Since viscous drag forces during chromosome movement are expected to scale with length, we hypothesize that the cross-section increase is necessary to limit the occurrence of large chromosome elongations that could slow or stall mitosis. Lastly, we note that individual vertebrate karyotypes typically exhibit a wider range of chromosome lengths as compared with angiosperms.

Indexed as

angiospermchromosomemitosisscaling analysisspindlevertebrate

Identifiers

PMID34249936
PMCPMC8262490
OpenAlexW3171432596

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.