Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34249751›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2021

Clinical Implementation of a 6D Treatment Chair for Fixed Ion Beam Lines.

Jiayao Sun, Lin Kong, Zhi Chen, Dan You, Jingfang Mao, Xiyin Guan, Xiaodong Wu, Yinxiangzi Sheng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Modeling and Validation of a Proton Therapy Couch Top.International journal of particle therapy · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jiayao SunDepartment of Medical Physics, Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center, Shanghai, China.
Lin KongShanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology (20dz2261000), Shanghai, China.
Zhi ChenDepartment of Medical Physics, Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center, Shanghai, China.
Dan YouShanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology (20dz2261000), Shanghai, China.
Jingfang MaoShanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology (20dz2261000), Shanghai, China.
Xiyin GuanShanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology (20dz2261000), Shanghai, China.
Xiaodong WuDepartment of Medical Physics, Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center, Shanghai, China.
Yinxiangzi ShengDepartment of Medical Physics, Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center, Shanghai, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo verify the practicality and safety of a treatment chair with six degrees of freedom (6DTC) through demonstrating the efficacy of the workflow in clinical settings and analyzing the obtained technical data, including intra-fraction patient movement during the use of the 6DTC. MATERIALS AND

methodsA clinical study was designed and conducted to test the clinical treatment workflow and the safety of the 6DTC. Based on the demonstrated dosimetric advantages, fifteen patients with head and neck tumors were selected and treated with the 6DTC. The positional error at the first beam position (PE-B1) and the second beam position (PE-B2) were analyzed and compared with the results from daily quality assurance (QA) procedures of the 6DTC and imaging system performed each day before clinical treatment. The intra-fraction patient movement was derived from the total patient alignment positional error and the QA data based on a Gaussian distribution formulism.

resultsThe QA results showed sub-millimeter mechanical accuracy of the 6DTC over the course of the clinical study. For 150 patient treatment fractions, the mean deviations between PE-B1 and PE-B2 were 0.13mm (SD 0.88mm), 0.25mm (SD 1.17mm), -0.57mm (SD 0.85mm), 0.02° (SD 0.35°), 0.00° (SD 0.37°), and -0.02° (SD 0.37°) in the x, y, z (translational), and u, v, w (rotational) directions, respectively. The calculated intra-fraction patient movement was -0.08mm (SD 0.56mm), 0.71mm (SD 1.12mm), -0.52mm (SD 0.84mm), 0.10° (SD 0.32°), 0.09° (SD 0.36°), and -0.04° (SD 0.36°) in the x, y, z, u, v, w directions, respectively.

conclusionsThe performance stability of the 6DTC was satisfactory. The position accuracy and intra-fraction patient movement in an upright posture with the 6DTC were verified and found adequate for clinical implementation.

Indexed as

carbon-ion radiotherapy (C-ion RT)intra-fraction movementsetup errortreatment chairupright posture

Identifiers

PMID34249751
PMCPMC8260974

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.