Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34249702›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2021

Automatic Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Detection in Whole Slide Images Using Deep Convolutional Neural Networks.

Hao Fu, Weiming Mi, Boju Pan, Yucheng Guo, Junjie Li, Rongyan Xu, Jie Zheng, Chunli Zou, Tao Zhang, Zhiyong Liang and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Explainable Lightweight Model Using Low-Rank and Convolutional Block Attention for Pancreatic Cancer Diagnosis.The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Hao FuDepartment of Automation, School of Information Science and Engineering, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai, China.
Weiming MiDepartment of Automation, School of Information Science and Technology, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Boju PanMolecular Pathology Research Center, Department of Pathology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital (PUMCH), Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Yucheng GuoYihai Center, Tsimage Medical Technology, Shenzhen, China.
Junjie LiMolecular Pathology Research Center, Department of Pathology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital (PUMCH), Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Rongyan XuShanghai Chenshan Plant Science Research Center, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China.
Jie ZhengYihai Center, Tsimage Medical Technology, Shenzhen, China.
Chunli ZouYihai Center, Tsimage Medical Technology, Shenzhen, China.
Tao ZhangDepartment of Automation, School of Information Science and Technology, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Zhiyong LiangMolecular Pathology Research Center, Department of Pathology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital (PUMCH), Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Junzhong ZouDepartment of Automation, School of Information Science and Engineering, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai, China.
Hao ZouYihai Center, Tsimage Medical Technology, Shenzhen, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is one of the deadliest cancer types worldwide, with the lowest 5-year survival rate among all kinds of cancers. Histopathology image analysis is considered a gold standard for PDAC detection and diagnosis. However, the manual diagnosis used in current clinical practice is a tedious and time-consuming task and diagnosis concordance can be low. With the development of digital imaging and machine learning, several scholars have proposed PDAC analysis approaches based on feature extraction methods that rely on field knowledge. However, feature-based classification methods are applicable only to a specific problem and lack versatility, so that the deep-learning method is becoming a vital alternative to feature extraction. This paper proposes the first deep convolutional neural network architecture for classifying and segmenting pancreatic histopathological images on a relatively large WSI dataset. Our automatic patch-level approach achieved 95.3% classification accuracy and the WSI-level approach achieved 100%. Additionally, we visualized the classification and segmentation outcomes of histopathological images to determine which areas of an image are more important for PDAC identification. Experimental results demonstrate that our proposed model can effectively diagnose PDAC using histopathological images, which illustrates the potential of this practical application.

Indexed as

convolutional neural networkdeep learninghistologypancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC)whole-slide image analysis

Identifiers

PMID34249702
PMCPMC8267174

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.