Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34249640›Full record

ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2021

Change in left ventricular velocity time integral during Trendelenburg maneuver predicts fluid responsiveness in cardiac surgical patients in the operating room.

Guo-Guang Ma, Li-Ying Xu, Jing-Chao Luo, Jun-Yi Hou, Guang-Wei Hao, Ying Su, Kai Liu, Shen-Ji Yu, Guo-Wei Tu, Zhe Luo

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Prediction of fluid responsiveness. What's new?Annals of intensive care · 2022
    Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Guo-Guang MaDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Li-Ying XuDepartment of Anesthesiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Jing-Chao LuoDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Jun-Yi HouDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Guang-Wei HaoDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Ying SuDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Kai LiuDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Shen-Ji YuDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Guo-Wei TuDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Zhe LuoDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University · CNZhongshan Hospital · CNFudan University · CNXinjiang Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFluid responsiveness is an important topic for clinicians. We investigated whether changes in left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) velocity time integral (VTI) during a Trendelenburg position (TP) maneuver can predict fluid responsiveness as a non-invasive marker in coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery patients in the operating room.

methodsThis prospective, single-center observational study, performed in the operating room, enrolled 65 elective CABG patients. Hemodynamic data coupled with transesophageal echocardiography monitoring of the LVOT VTI and the peak velocity were collected at each step [baseline 1, TP, baseline 2 and fluid challenge (FC)]. Patients whose VTI increased ≥15% after FC (500 mL of Gelofusine infusion within 30 min) were considered responders.

resultsTwenty-eight (43.1%) patients were responders to fluid administration. VTI changes during the TP maneuver predicted fluid responsiveness with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.90 (95% CI, 0.79-0.96), with a sensitivity of 100%, and a specificity of 70% at a threshold of 10% (gray zone, 8-15%). The increase in VTI during the TP was correlated with the VTI changes induced by FC (r=0.61, P<0.0001). Changes in peak velocity and pulse pressure during the TP were poorly predictive of fluid responsiveness, with an AUC of 0.72 (95% CI: 0.60-0.82) and 0.66 (95% CI: 0.53-0.77), respectively.

conclusionsAn increase in VTI induced by the TP could predict fluid responsiveness in CABG patients in the operating room. However, changes in peak velocity and pulse pressure stimulated by the TP could not reliably predict fluid responsiveness.

Indexed as

cardiac surgeryFluid responsivenesshemodynamic monitoringtransesophageal echocardiography (TEE)Trendelenburg position (TP)velocity time integral (VTI)

Identifiers

PMID34249640
PMCPMC8250022
OpenAlexW3159181111

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.