ReviewCureus2021
HIV Pre-exposure Prophylaxis in the LGBTQ Community: A Review of Practice and Places.
Review in Cureus, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Let's Connect: Impact Evaluation of an Intervention to Reduce Mental Health Disparities Among People Who are LGBTQ+ .Community mental health journal · 2024Trial
- Article
- Holistic Sexual-Reproductive Healthcare Services and Needs for Queer Individuals: Healthcare Providers' Perspectives.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
One in six bisexual and gay men will be diagnosed with HIV in their lifetime (Human Rights Campaign, 2017). Without a vaccine or cure, prevention may be the best tool to control the HIV pandemic. Since 2012, the World Health Organization (WHO) recommends HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) for a high-risk population. To this day, in the United States (U.S.), the group with the highest risk is MSM (men who have sex with other men) that have condom-less sexual intercourse (Center for Disease Control and Prevention, 2019). In fact, in 2018, over 50% of all HIV infections occurred in MSM and members of the LGBT community. A systematic review was conducted using PubMed, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Library. The inclusive criteria were articles published from 2015-2020, focusing specifically on HIV PrEP among the members of the LGBTQ+ community. The keywords for our search were "Pre-exposure prophylaxis," "HIV," "men who have sex with other men" (MSM), "Bisexual," "transgender." A total of 25 articles met the inclusion criteria. About 50% of the articles focused on MSM while others highlighted bisexual and transgender women. Globally, PrEP is a priority. Programs to educate and promote its use are being developed, but challenges are present regarding access to PrEP and its maintenance for longer than 12 months. In the U.S., PrEP programs started in 2012, intending to promote and educate. Research shows that more than 60% of the high-risk patients are willing to try PrEP if they are correctly educated, showing that physicians were not doing a thorough job educating their patients. PrEP is essential for preventing the transmission of HIV among the LGBTQ+ subpopulation. Existing gaps need to be bridged to create or improve to educate high-risk populations and physicians on HIV PrEP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.