Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34249516›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2021

Identification of pathogen(s) in infectious diseases using shotgun metagenomic sequencing and conventional culture: a comparative study.

Huan Chen, Jun Li, Shanshan Yan, Hui Sun, Chuyi Tan, Meidong Liu, Ke Liu, Huali Zhang, Mingxiang Zou, Xianzhong Xiao

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Journal of clinical medicine · 2024
    Review
  9. Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  10. Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  11. Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  12. Molecular Methodologies for Improved Polymicrobial Sepsis Diagnosis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Huan ChenPostdoctoral Research Station of Clinical Medicine & Department of Hematology, Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.ORCID 0000-0002-0548-5137
Jun LiDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Shanshan YanDepartment of Intensive Medicine, Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Hui SunSepsis Translational Medicine Key Lab of Hunan Province, Department of Pathophysiology, School of Basic Medicine Science, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Chuyi TanSepsis Translational Medicine Key Lab of Hunan Province, Department of Pathophysiology, School of Basic Medicine Science, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Meidong LiuSepsis Translational Medicine Key Lab of Hunan Province, Department of Pathophysiology, School of Basic Medicine Science, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Ke LiuSepsis Translational Medicine Key Lab of Hunan Province, Department of Pathophysiology, School of Basic Medicine Science, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Huali ZhangSepsis Translational Medicine Key Lab of Hunan Province, Department of Pathophysiology, School of Basic Medicine Science, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Mingxiang ZouDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Xianzhong XiaoSepsis Translational Medicine Key Lab of Hunan Province, Department of Pathophysiology, School of Basic Medicine Science, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Central South University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEarly and accurate diagnosis of microorganism(s) is important to optimize antimicrobial therapy. Shotgun metagenomic sequencing technology, an unbiased and comprehensive method for pathogen identification, seems to potentially assist or even replace conventional microbiological methodology in the diagnosis of infectious diseases. However, evidence in clinical application of this platform is relatively limited.

methodsTo evaluate the capability of shotgun metagenomic sequencing technology in clinical practice, both shotgun metagenomic sequencing and conventional culture were performed in the PCR-positive body fluid specimens of 20 patients with suspected infection. The sequenced data were then analyzed for taxonomic identification of microbes and antibiotic resistance gene prediction using bioinformatics pipeline.

resultsShotgun metagenomic sequencing results showed a concordance of 17/20 compared with culture results in bacterial detection, and a concordance of 20/20 compared with culture results in fungal detection. Besides, drug-resistant types annotated from antibiotic resistance genes showed much similarity with antibiotic classes identified by susceptibility tests, and more than half of the specimens had consistent drug types between shotgun metagenomic sequencing and culture results.

conclusionsPathogen identification and antibiotic resistance gene prediction by shotgun metagenomic sequencing identification had the potential to diagnose microorganisms in infectious diseases, and it was especially helpful for multiple microbial co-infections and for the cases where standard culture approached failed to identify microorganisms.

Indexed as

Antibiotic resistanceCultureInfectious diseasePathogen identificationShotgun metagenomic sequencing

Identifiers

PMID34249516
PMCPMC8253115
OpenAlexW3173975806

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.