Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34249441›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of cancer research2021

Screening and diagnosis of colorectal cancer and advanced adenoma by Bionic Glycome method and machine learning.

Yiqing Pan, Lei Zhang, Rongrong Zhang, Jing Han, Wenjun Qin, Yong Gu, Jichen Sha, Xiaoyan Xu, Yi Feng, Zhipeng Ren and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of cancer research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. The Role of Clinical Glyco(proteo)mics in Precision Medicine.Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP · 2023
    Article
  17. SerumBiomolecules · 2023
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Yiqing PanNHC Key Laboratory of Glycoconjugates Research, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Fudan University Shanghai 200032, P. R. China.
Lei ZhangInstitutes of Biomedical Sciences, Fudan University Shanghai 200032, P. R. China.
Rongrong ZhangNHC Key Laboratory of Glycoconjugates Research, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Fudan University Shanghai 200032, P. R. China.
Jing HanNHC Key Laboratory of Glycoconjugates Research, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Fudan University Shanghai 200032, P. R. China.
Wenjun QinNHC Key Laboratory of Glycoconjugates Research, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Fudan University Shanghai 200032, P. R. China.
Yong GuNHC Key Laboratory of Glycoconjugates Research, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Fudan University Shanghai 200032, P. R. China.
Jichen ShaNHC Key Laboratory of Glycoconjugates Research, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Fudan University Shanghai 200032, P. R. China.
Xiaoyan XuNHC Key Laboratory of Glycoconjugates Research, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Fudan University Shanghai 200032, P. R. China.
Yi FengDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Shanghai East Hospital, Tongji University Shanghai 200120, P. R. China.
Zhipeng RenDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Shanghai East Hospital, Tongji University Shanghai 200120, P. R. China.
Jiawen DaiDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Shanghai East Hospital, Tongji University Shanghai 200120, P. R. China.
Ben HuangDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Shanghai East Hospital, Tongji University Shanghai 200120, P. R. China.
Shifang RenNHC Key Laboratory of Glycoconjugates Research, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Fudan University Shanghai 200032, P. R. China.
Jianxin GuNHC Key Laboratory of Glycoconjugates Research, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Fudan University Shanghai 200032, P. R. China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Colorectal cancer (CRC), one of the major health problems worldwide, mostly develops from colorectal adenomas. Advanced adenomas are generally considered as precancerous lesions and patients are recommended to remove the adenomas. Screening for colorectal cancer is usually performed by fecal tests (FOBT or FIT) and colonoscopy, however, their benefits are limited by uptake and adherence. Most CRC develops from colorectal advanced adenomas, but there is currently a lack of effective noninvasive screening method for advanced adenomas. N-glycans in human serum hold the great potentials as biomarker for diagnosis of human cancers. Our aim was to discover blood-based markers for screening and diagnosis of advanced adenomas and CRC, and to ascertain their efficiency in classifying healthy controls, patients with advanced adenomas and CRC by incorporating machine learning techniques with reliable and simple quantitative method with "Bionic Glycome" as internal standard based on the high-throughput Matrix-assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization Mass Spectrometry (MALDI-MS). The quantitative results showed that there is a positive correlation between multi-antennary, sialylated N-glycans and CRC progress, while bi-antennary core-fucosylated N-glycans are negatively correlated with CRC progress. Machine learning is a powerful classification tool, suitable for mining big data, especially the large amount of data generated by high-throughput technologies. Using the predictive model constructed by machine learning, we obtained the classification accuracy of 75% for classification of 189 samples including CRC, advanced adenomas and healthy controls, and the accuracy of 87% for detection of the disease group that required treatment, including CRC and advanced adenomas. To our delight, the model successfully applied to the prediction of 176 samples collected a few months later, and five samples were wrongly predicted in the disease group. Overall, this diagnostic model we constructed here has valuable potential in the clinical application of detecting advanced adenomas and colorectal cancer and could compensate for the limitations of the current screening methods for detection of CRC and advanced adenomas.

Indexed as

advanced adenomabiomarkerColorectal cancerinternal standardmachine learningmass spectrometryserum N-glycome quantification

Identifiers

PMID34249441
PMCPMC8263652

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.