ArticleHealth information science and systems2021
A novel information sharing framework for people living with type-2 diabetes in the context of a group education program.
Article in Health information science and systems, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Qualitative Analysis of Patient Experiences Using Semaglutide 2.4 mg for Weight Loss.Obesity science & practice · 2025Article
- Physical Activity Interventions in People with Diabetes: A Systematic Review of The Qualitative Evidence.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeOnline health communities (OHCs) offer opportunities for people with type-2 diabetes to share information and experiences for self improvement. This study is to introduce a novel framework for identifying the potential of online diabetes communities' practices and outcomes in empowering people living with diabetes.
method: Using a qualitative tradition, we conducted semi-structured interviews with 15 members of these communities, attempting to answer research question: how an online framework for diabetes community can be outlined for empowering patients in their self-management in the context of DGEP. We also analysed 2312 threads shared in the three popular type-2 diabetes Reddit communities (r/diabetes, r/diabetes_t2, and r/type2diabetes) comprising more than 60,000 members.?
resultsUsing thematic analysis, the study identifies three salient themes: (a) Leverage digital health technologies to ubiquitous access, share and integrate resources, (b) Community encouragement in self-care and self-monitoring, and (c) Improve mental well-being by experiencing commonality. Statistically, on average 87% of the participants contended that they would benefit the OHC framework for keeping them interconnected to the program. Furthermore, expert interviews with the healthcare team have been carried out for evaluating the usability and efficiency of the framework.
conclusionsThe proposed information-sharing framework promotes patients' self-management of diabetes, revealing that patient participation in diabetes OHC leads to empowering self-management of their diabetes and in turns shedding some light on how healthcare organizations can improve patients' information behaviour through OHC provisions. This qualitative study suggested that the proposed novel framework is perceived as a useful platform to empower diabetic patients in their self-management, extending value of physical group activities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.