Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34248786›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2021

Protect ya Grandma! The Effects of Students' Epistemic Beliefs and Prosocial Values on COVID-19 Vaccination Intentions.

Tom Rosman, Kathrin Adler, Luisa Barbian, Vanessa Blume, Benno Burczeck, Vivien Cordes, Dilara Derman, Susanne Dertli, Hannah Glas, Virginia Heinen and 14 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Should governments moralize health?Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Undergraduate Vaccine Hesitancy and the Influence of "Home" Locales.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  8. Open science and public trust in science: Results from two studies.Public understanding of science (Bristol, England) · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors.

Tom RosmanLeibniz Institute for Psychology (ZPID), Research Literacy Unit, Trier, Germany.
Kathrin AdlerUniversity of Trier, Psychology Department, Trier, Germany.
Luisa BarbianUniversity of Trier, Psychology Department, Trier, Germany.
Vanessa BlumeUniversity of Trier, Psychology Department, Trier, Germany.
Benno BurczeckUniversity of Trier, Psychology Department, Trier, Germany.
Vivien CordesUniversity of Trier, Psychology Department, Trier, Germany.
Dilara DermanUniversity of Trier, Psychology Department, Trier, Germany.
Susanne DertliUniversity of Trier, Psychology Department, Trier, Germany.
Hannah GlasUniversity of Trier, Psychology Department, Trier, Germany.
Virginia HeinenUniversity of Trier, Psychology Department, Trier, Germany.
Stefan KenstUniversity of Trier, Psychology Department, Trier, Germany.
Marie KhosroschahliUniversity of Trier, Psychology Department, Trier, Germany.
Laura KittelUniversity of Trier, Psychology Department, Trier, Germany.
Corinna KrausUniversity of Trier, Psychology Department, Trier, Germany.
Alica LindenUniversity of Trier, Psychology Department, Trier, Germany.
Anastasia MironovaUniversity of Trier, Psychology Department, Trier, Germany.
Lena OlingerUniversity of Trier, Psychology Department, Trier, Germany.
Fatbardh RastelicaUniversity of Trier, Psychology Department, Trier, Germany.
Theresia SauterUniversity of Trier, Psychology Department, Trier, Germany.
Vera SchnurrUniversity of Trier, Psychology Department, Trier, Germany.
Elisabeth SchwabUniversity of Trier, Psychology Department, Trier, Germany.
Yves VieyraUniversity of Trier, Psychology Department, Trier, Germany.
Andreas ZidakUniversity of Trier, Psychology Department, Trier, Germany.
Ivana ZidarovaUniversity of Trier, Psychology Department, Trier, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present study investigates epistemic beliefs (beliefs about the nature of knowledge and knowing) and prosocial values as predictors of COVID-19 vaccination intentions. As a first hypothesis, we posit that beliefs in justification by authority will positively relate to vaccination intentions. Second, we expect a positive relationship between prosocial values and vaccination intentions. Third, we hypothesize that beliefs in justification by authority moderate the relationship between prosocial values and vaccination intentions, so that the positive correlation between prosocial values and vaccination intentions becomes stronger with increasing beliefs in justification by authority. Hypotheses were tested in a sample of

Indexed as

COVID-19epistemic beliefsjustification by authorityprosocial valuesvaccination intentions

Identifiers

PMID34248786
PMCPMC8268677

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.