Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34248769›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in psychology2021

A Research Agenda to Better Understand the Human Dimensions of Energy Transitions.

Linda Steg, Goda Perlaviciute, Benjamin K Sovacool, Marino Bonaiuto, Andreas Diekmann, Massimo Filippini, Frank Hindriks, Cecilia Jacobbson Bergstad, Ellen Matthies, Simon Matti and 9 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in psychology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
16.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 12 institutions in 9 countries.

Linda StegFaculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.
Goda PerlaviciuteFaculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.
Benjamin K SovacoolScience Policy Research Unit, University of Sussex, Brighton, United Kingdom.
Marino BonaiutoFaculty of Medicine and Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Andreas DiekmannDepartment of Humanities, Social and Political Sciences, Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.
Massimo FilippiniDepartment of Management, Technology, and Economics, Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.
Frank HindriksFaculty of Philosophy, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.
Cecilia Jacobbson BergstadDepartment of Psychology, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Ellen MatthiesInstitute of Psychology, Otto von Guericke Universität Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.
Simon MattiDepartment of Business Administration, Technology and Social Sciences, Luleå University of Technology, Luleå, Sweden.
Machiel MulderFaculty of Economics and Business, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.
Andreas NilssonDepartment of Psychology, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Sabina PahlSchool of Psychology, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, United Kingdom.
Martha RoggenkampFaculty of Law, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.
Geertje SchuitemaCollege of Business, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Paul C SternSocial and Environmental Research Institute, Greenfield, MA, United States.
Massimo TavoniDepartment of Management, Economics and Industrial Engineering, Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy.
John ThøgersenDepartment of Management, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Edwin WoerdmanFaculty of Law, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.
University of Groningen · NLETH Zurich · CHUniversity of Gothenburg · SEAarhus University · DKLuleå University of Technology · SEOtto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg · DEPolitecnico di Milano · ITSapienza University of Rome · ITSocial and Environmental Research Institute · USUniversity College Dublin · IEUniversity of Plymouth · GBUniversity of Sussex · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Social Sciences and Humanities (SSH) have a key role to play in understanding which factors and policies would motivate, encourage and enable different actors to adopt a wide range of sustainable energy behaviours and support the required system changes and policies. The SSH can provide critical insights into how consumers could be empowered to consistently engage in sustainable energy behaviour, support and adopt new technologies, and support policies and changes in energy systems. Furthermore, they can increase our understanding of how organisations such as private and public institutions, and groups and associations of people can play a key role in the sustainable energy transition. We identify key questions to be addressed that have been identified by the Platform for Energy Research in the Socio-economic Nexus (PERSON, see person.eu), including SSH scholars who have been studying energy issues for many years. We identify three main research themes. The first research theme involves understanding which factors encourage different actors to engage in sustainable energy behaviour. The second research theme focuses on understanding which interventions can be effective in encouraging sustainable energy behaviour of different actors, and which factors enhance their effects. The third research theme concerns understanding which factors affect public and policy support for energy policy and changes in energy systems, and how important public concerns can best be addressed as to reduce or prevent resistance.

Indexed as

behaviour changeenergy transitionhumanitiespublic supportresearch agendasocial sciencessustainable energy behaviour

Identifiers

PMID34248769
PMCPMC8267066
OpenAlexW3176206958

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.