Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34248747›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in psychology2021

Psychological Predictors of Energy Saving Behavior: A Meta-Analytic Approach.

Giuseppe Carrus, Lorenza Tiberio, Stefano Mastandrea, Parissa Chokrai, Immo Fritsche, Christian A Klöckner, Torsten Masson, Stepan Vesely, Angelo Panno

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in psychology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Giuseppe CarrusDepartment of Education, Experimental Psychology Laboratory, Roma Tre University, Rome, Italy.
Lorenza TiberioDepartment of Education, Experimental Psychology Laboratory, Roma Tre University, Rome, Italy.
Stefano MastandreaDepartment of Education, Experimental Psychology Laboratory, Roma Tre University, Rome, Italy.
Parissa ChokraiDepartment of Social Psychology, Institute of Psychology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Immo FritscheDepartment of Social Psychology, Institute of Psychology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Christian A KlöcknerDepartment of Psychology, Faculty of Social and Educational Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Torsten MassonDepartment of Social Psychology, Institute of Psychology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Stepan VeselyDepartment of Psychology, Faculty of Social and Educational Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Angelo PannoDepartment of Human Science, European University of Rome, Rome, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding how psychological processes drive human energy choices is an urgent, and yet relatively under-investigated, need for contemporary society. A knowledge gap still persists on the links between psychological factors identified in earlier studies and people's behaviors in the energy domain. This research applies a meta-analytical procedure to assess the strength of the associations between five different classes of individual variables (i.e.,: attitudes, intentions, values, awareness, and emotions) and energy-saving behavioral intentions and behaviors (self-reported and actual). Based on a systematic review of studies published between 2007 and 2017, we estimate the average effect size of predictor-criterion relations, and we assess relevant moderators and publication bias, drawing on data obtained from 102 independent samples reported in 67 published studies (

Indexed as

attitudesawarenessemotionsenergy saving behaviorsintentionsmeta-analysisvalues

Identifiers

PMID34248747
PMCPMC8265205

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.