Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34248742›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in psychology2021

Promoting EF With Preschool Interventions: Lessons Learned From 15 Years of Conducting Large-Scale Studies.

Shira Mattera, Natalia M Rojas, Pamela A Morris, Karen Bierman

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in psychology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Shira MatteraMDRC, New York, NY, United States.
Natalia M RojasDepartment of Population Health, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States.
Pamela A MorrisDepartment of Applied Psychology, New York University, New York, NY, United States.
Karen BiermanDepartment of Psychology, Pennsylvania State University, State College, PA, United States.

Funding

Head Start REDI (Research-based, Developmentally Informed)R01HD046064 · NICHD · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY-UNIV PARK · PI BIERMAN, KAREN L · 2003 to 2024
$14.7M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD046064
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the past two decades, a growing number of early childhood interventions that aim to improve school readiness have also targeted children's executive function (EF), building on the theory that promoting EF skills in preschool may play a key role in reducing the substantial gaps in school readiness and later achievement associated with family income. Despite the expansion of school readiness interventions across preschool, research evidence is mixed regarding what works to promote EF development and the impact of these interventions on children's EF skills, and subsequently, their academic and behavioral outcomes. This paper reviews four intervention approaches designed to support school readiness that may also improve children's EF skills by: (a) encouraging adaptive classroom behaviors, (b) improving social-emotional learning, (c) promoting play and direct training of EF skills, and (d) improving cognitive skills related to EF. We describe program effects from rigorous trials testing these approaches, including summarizing the takeaways from four large-scale intervention research studies conducted by the authors, involving over 5,000 children. We conclude by exploring open questions for the field and future directions for research and intervention program development and refinement.

Indexed as

academic achievementexecutive functioninterventionspreschoolschool readiness

Identifiers

PMID34248742
PMCPMC8264511

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.