ArticleFrontiers in physiology2021
Application of Machine Learning in Pulmonary Function Assessment Where Are We Now and Where Are We Going?
Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Comprehensive application of artificial intelligence in preserved ratio impaired spirometry: A systematic literature review.PloS one · 2026Pooled it
- Machine learning-based integration of respiratory oscillometry and spirometry for predicting clinical outcomes in spinal muscular atrophy.European journal of pediatrics · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence in clinical physiology: System-wise applications in diagnostics, monitoring, and medical education.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2026Article
- Classification of pulmonary diseases using machine learning and deep learning models on GLI-2012 standardized spirometry features.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
- Preparing Allergists to Practice in 2050 Using Artificial Intelligence.The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. In practice · 2025Review
- Hyperconcentrated mucus in small airways: a mechanistic model for the pathogenesis of paediatric bronchiectasis.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2025Review
- Pathways to chronic disease detection and prediction: Mapping the potential of machine learning to the pathophysiological processes while navigating ethical challenges.Chronic diseases and translational medicine · 2025Review
- Development and External Validation of a Machine Learning Model to Predict Restriction from Spirometry.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
- Monitoring respiratory function with telemedicine devices in asthmatic children.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Machine learning for accurate detection of small airway dysfunction-related respiratory changes: an observational study.Respiratory research · 2024Observational
- Early Diagnosis and Treatment of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis: A Narrative Review.Pulmonary therapy · 2023Review
- Predicting total lung capacity from spirometry: a machine learning approach.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Article
- Deep Learning-Based Analytic Models Based on Flow-Volume Curves for Identifying Ventilatory Patterns.Frontiers in physiology · 2022Article
- Editorial: Investigating exposures and respiratory health in coffee workers.Frontiers in public health · 2022Article
- A Strategy for Field Evaluations of Exposures and Respiratory Health of Workers at Small- to Medium-Sized Coffee Facilities.Frontiers in public health · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Analysis of pulmonary function tests (PFTs) is an area where machine learning (ML) may benefit clinicians, researchers, and the patients. PFT measures spirometry, lung volumes, and carbon monoxide diffusion capacity of the lung (DLCO). The results are usually interpreted by the clinicians using discrete numeric data according to published guidelines. PFT interpretations by clinicians, however, are known to have inter-rater variability and the inaccuracy can impact patient care. This variability may be caused by unfamiliarity of the guidelines, lack of training, inadequate understanding of lung physiology, or simply mental lapses. A rules-based automated interpretation system can recapitulate expert's pattern recognition capability and decrease errors. ML can also be used to analyze continuous data or the graphics, including the flow-volume loop, the DLCO and the nitrogen washout curves. These analyses can discover novel physiological biomarkers. In the era of wearables and telehealth, particularly with the COVID-19 pandemic restricting PFTs to be done in the clinical laboratories, ML can also be used to combine mobile spirometry results with an individual's clinical profile to deliver precision medicine. There are, however, hurdles in the development and commercialization of the ML-assisted PFT interpretation programs, including the need for high quality representative data, the existence of different formats for data acquisition and sharing in PFT software by different vendors, and the need for collaboration amongst clinicians, biomedical engineers, and information technologists. Hurdles notwithstanding, the new developments would represent significant advances that could be the future of PFT, the oldest test still in use in clinical medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.