Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34248445›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of integrated care

Developing Interpersonal Trust Between Service Users and Professionals in Integrated Services: Compensating for Latent Distrust, Vulnerabilities and Uncertainty Shaped by Organisational Context.

Rie Mandrup Poulsen, Kathrine Hoffmann Pii, Lene Falgaard Eplov, Mathias Meijer, Ute Bültmann, Ulla Christensen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of integrated care. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Engineering Integrated Care Expansion and Innovation: Drawing upon Nursing Leadership.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Rie Mandrup PoulsenThe National Board of Social Services, Center for Data, Analysis and Methods, Edisonsvej 1, 5000 Odense C, Denmark.
Kathrine Hoffmann PiiUniversity College Copenhagen, Faculty of Health, Institute for Nursing and Nutrition, Tagensvej 86, 2200 Copenhagen N, Denmark.
Lene Falgaard EplovCopenhagen Research Center for Mental Health - CORE, Mental Health Center Copenhagen, Copenhagen University Hospital, Kildegårdsvej 28, Entr. 3A, 4th floor, 2900 Hellerup, Denmark.
Mathias MeijerUniversity College Copenhagen, Faculty of Health, Institute for Nursing and Nutrition, Tagensvej 86, 2200 Copenhagen N, Denmark.
Ute BültmannUniversity of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Health Sciences, Community and Occupational Medicine, Hanzeplein 1, FA 10, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands.
Ulla ChristensenDepartment of Public Health, Section of Social Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Øster Farimagsgade 5, P.O.B. 2099, 1014 Copenhagen K, Denmark.
University College Copenhagen · DKCopenhagen University Hospital · DKNational Board of Health · DKUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NLUniversity of Copenhagen · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionStudies show a need for trust between stakeholders in integrated services. However, few studies have investigated how trust develops between stakeholders on a micro-level. In a Danish intersectoral intervention for persons on sick leave due to common mental disorders, we explored why trust is needed and how trust is developed between micro-level stakeholders. METHODOLOGY: The qualitative study was based on 12 observations of inter-organisational meetings, 16 interviews with service users, 24 interviews with health care professionals and employment consultants, and 8 interviews with supervisors. The analysis was guided by the theoretical concepts (dis-) trust, vulnerability and uncertainty.

resultsLatent distrust between involved organisations, and vulnerabilities and uncertainties related to employment consultants' statutory power over service users caused a perceived need for interpersonal trust. Time to establish knowledge-based relationships, healthcare professionals' caring approach, and creating a feeling of sharing interests were compensating trust-building strategies that were often regarded as positive. DISCUSSION AND

conclusionTrust in personal relationships between stakeholders appeared to compensate for contextually shaped distrust, vulnerability and uncertainty. Identifying latent distrust, vulnerabilities, uncertainties, and power structures might be key to improving trust-building strategies in a specific context. The time-consuming process of trust-building between micro-level stakeholders should be supported structurally.

Indexed as

common mental disordersintegrated servicesorganisational contextperson-centred servicesprocess evaluationtrust

Identifiers

PMID34248445
PMCPMC8252972
OpenAlexW3175999092

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.