Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34248358›Full record

ReviewInfectious diseases2021

Fleischer Cn Kotey, Nicholas Tkd Dayie, Patience B Tetteh-Uarcoo, Eric S Donkor

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Infectious diseases, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Blood Stream Infections due toInternational journal of microbiology · 2026
    Article
  8. Natural product based approaches to overcomeFrontiers in antibiotics · 2026
    Review
  9. Article
  10. The Prevalence and Drug Susceptibility ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  11. A Comprehensive Overview ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Early-Onset Candidemia in Adult Intensive Care Units.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Deciphering cargo contents in extracellular vesicles ofComputational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Fleischer Cn KoteyDepartment of Medical Microbiology, University of Ghana Medical School, Korle Bu, Accra, Ghana.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0286-3638
Nicholas Tkd DayieDepartment of Medical Microbiology, University of Ghana Medical School, Korle Bu, Accra, Ghana.
Patience B Tetteh-UarcooDepartment of Medical Microbiology, University of Ghana Medical School, Korle Bu, Accra, Ghana.
Eric S DonkorDepartment of Medical Microbiology, University of Ghana Medical School, Korle Bu, Accra, Ghana.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9368-0636

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The literature on bloodstream infections (BSIs) have predominantly been biased towards bacteria, given their superior clinical significance in comparison with the other types of microorganisms. Fungal pathogens have epidemiologically received relatively less attention, although they constitute an important proportion of BSI aetiologies. In this review, the authors discuss the clinical relevance of fungal BSIs in the context of

Indexed as

antifungal resistanceBloodstream infectionsCandida speciesfungal pathogens

Identifiers

PMID34248358
PMCPMC8236779

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.