Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34248350›Full record

ArticleAfrican journal of urology : the official journal of the Pan African Urological Surgeons' Association (PAUSA)2021

Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on non-COVID patient's management in urology: a public hospital experience in Mumbai.

Nikhilesh A Jibhakate, Sujata K Patwardhan, Ajit S Sawant, Hemant R Pathak, Bhushan P Patil, Hitesh Kamal

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in African journal of urology : the official journal of the Pan African Urological Surgeons' Association (PAUSA), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Nikhilesh A JibhakateDepartment of Urology, Seth GS Medical College and KEM Hospital, Parel, Mumbai, Maharashtra 400012 India.
Sujata K PatwardhanDepartment of Urology, Seth GS Medical College and KEM Hospital, Parel, Mumbai, Maharashtra 400012 India.
Ajit S SawantDepartment of Urology, Lokmanya Tilak Medical College and General Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra India.
Hemant R PathakDepartment of Urology, TNMC and BYL Nair Ch. Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra India.
Bhushan P PatilDepartment of Urology, Seth GS Medical College and KEM Hospital, Parel, Mumbai, Maharashtra 400012 India.
Hitesh KamalDepartment of Urology, Seth GS Medical College and KEM Hospital, Parel, Mumbai, Maharashtra 400012 India.
King Edward Memorial Hospital and Seth G.S. Medical College · INLokmanya Tilak Municipal General Hospital and Lokmanya Tilak Municipal Medical College · INTopiwala National Medical College & BYL Nair Charitable Hospital · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo evaluate the impact of COVID-19 lockdown on non-COVID urological patient's management in tertiary care urology centres.

methodsThis is an observational study in which data of patients visiting the urology department of all the MCGM run tertiary care hospitals were recorded for the duration of 1 April 2020 to 31 July 2020 and were compared to data of pre-COVID-19 period of similar duration.

resultsThere was a decrease of 93.86% in indoor admissions of urology patients during the COVID-19 lockdown. Indoor admissions for stone disease, haematuria, malignancy accounted for 53.65%, 15.85%, 9.75%, respectively. Elective surgeries had the highest percentage decrease followed by emergency and semi-emergency procedures. There was a reduction of more than 80% in patients attending outpatient clinics. Stone disease and its consequences were the main reasons for visiting outdoor clinics (39%). A substantial number of patients presented with flank and abdominal pain (14.8%) and benign enlargement of the prostate (10.23%). Malignancy accounted for a very small number of patients visiting outdoor clinics (1.58%).

conclusionsCOVID-19 pandemic has a profound impact on patient care and education in Urology. There was more than ninety percent reduction in indoor admissions, operative procedures, and outpatient clinics attendance. Once the pandemic is controlled, there will be a large number of patients seeking consultation and management for urological conditions and we should be prepared for it. Surgical training of urology residents needs to be compensated in near future. Long-term impact on urological patient outcome remains to be defined.

Indexed as

COVID-19MCGMMumbaiPandemicUrology

Identifiers

PMID34248350
PMCPMC8258485
OpenAlexW3182964932

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.