Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34248343›Full record

SynthesisJSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons

Simultaneous Robot Assisted Colon and Liver Resection for Metastatic Colon Cancer.

Matthew McGuirk, Mahir Gachabayov, Aram Rojas, Agon Kajmolli, Shekhar Gogna, Katie W Gu, Qian Qiuye, Xiang Da Dong

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Conversion following minimally invasive attempt at simultaneous colorectal and liver resection does not affect 30-day postoperative overall morbidity.Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Matthew McGuirkDepartment of Surgery, Westchester Medical Center/New York Medical College.
Mahir GachabayovDepartment of Surgery, Westchester Medical Center/New York Medical College.
Aram RojasDepartment of Surgery, Westchester Medical Center/New York Medical College.
Agon KajmolliDepartment of Surgery, Westchester Medical Center/New York Medical College.
Shekhar GognaDepartment of Surgery, Westchester Medical Center/New York Medical College.
Katie W GuDepartment of Surgery, Westchester Medical Center/New York Medical College.
Qian QiuyeDepartment of Surgery, Nuvance Health-Whittingham Cancer Center.
Xiang Da DongDepartment of Surgery, Nuvance Health-Whittingham Cancer Center.
Westchester Medical Center · USWhittington Health NHS Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSimultaneous robot assisted colon and liver resections are being performed more frequently at present due to the expanded adoption of the robotic platform for surgical management of metastatic colon cancer. However, this approach has not been studied in detail with only case series available in the literature. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the current body of evidence on the feasibility of performing simultaneous robotic colon and liver resections.

methodsA systematic review was performed through PubMed to identify relevant articles describing simultaneous colon and liver resections for metastatic colon cancer.

resultsA total of 28 patients underwent simultaneous resections robotically with an average operative time of 420.3 minutes and average blood loss of 275.6 ml. Postoperative stay was 8.6 days on average with all cases achieving negative surgical margins.

conclusionsRobotic simultaneous resection of colorectal cancer with liver metastases is technically feasible and seems oncologically equivalent to open or laparoscopic surgery. Further studies are urgently needed to assess benefits of robotic surgery in the patient population.

Indexed as

AdultAgedColectomyColonic NeoplasmsCombined Modality TherapyHepatectomyHumansLaparoscopyLiver NeoplasmsMaleMargins of ExcisionMiddle AgedOperative TimeRobotic Surgical ProceduresColon cancerLiver metastasisLiver resectionMulti-organ resectionRobotic surgery

Identifiers

PMID34248343
PMCPMC8249220
OpenAlexW3181329723

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.