ArticleProceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering2020
Comparative Study of Dual Energy Cone-Beam CT using a Dual-Layer Detector and kVp Switching for Material Decomposition.
Article in Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Dual-Energy CBCT With Reduced Scatter and Cone Beam Artifacts Using an X-Ray Source Array and Interlaced Spectral Filters.IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering · 2026Article
- Characterization of Breast Microcalcifications Using Dual-Energy CBCT: Impact of Detector Configuration on Imaging Performance-A Simulation Study.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Performance of Dual-Layer Flat-Panel Detectors.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Feasibility of dual-energy CBCT material decomposition in the human torso with 2D anti-scatter grids and grid-based scatter sampling.Medical physics · 2024Article
- Photon counting-energy integrating hybrid flat panel detector systems for image-guided interventions: an experimental proof-of-concept.Physics in medicine and biology · 2023Article
- Single-pass metal artifact reduction using a dual-layer flat panel detector.Medical physics · 2021Article
- A unified scatter rejection and correction method for cone beam computed tomography.Medical physics · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cone-beam CT (CBCT) is widely used in diagnostic imaging and image-guided procedures, leading to an increasing need for advanced CBCT techniques, such as dual energy (DE) imaging. Previous studies have shown that DE-CBCT can perform quantitative material decomposition, including quantification of contrast agents, electron density, and virtual monoenergetic images. Currently, most CBCT systems perform DE imaging using a kVp switching technique. However, the disadvantages of this method are spatial and temporal misregistration as well as total scan time increase, leading to errors in the material decomposition. DE-CBCT with a dual layer flat panel detector potentially overcomes these limitations by acquiring the dual energy images simultaneously. In this work, we investigate the DE imaging performance of a prototype dual layer detector by evaluating its material decomposition capability and comparing its performance to that of the kVp switching method. Two sets of x-ray spectra were used for kVp switching: 80/120 kVp and 80/120 kVp + 1 mm Cu filtration. Our results show the dual layer detector outperforms kVp switching at 80/120 kVp with matched dose. The performance of kVp switching was better by adding 1 mm copper filtration to the high energy images (80/120 kVp + 1 mm Cu), though the dual layer detector still provided comparable performance for material decomposition tasks. Overall, both the dual layer detector and kVp switching methods provided quantitative material decomposition images in DE-CBCT, with the dual layer detector having additional potential advantages.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.