Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34248143›Full record

ReviewBulletin de l'Academie nationale de medecine2021

[Pandemic forced telework, a new psychosocial risk. Reflections on the health issues and the necessary support].

A Chamoux

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bulletin de l'Academie nationale de medecine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

A ChamouxFaculté de médecine, université Clermont-Auvergne, Académie nationale de médecine, 16, rue Bonaparte, 75006 Paris, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the COVID-19 pandemic, barrier measures also concerned the world of work. In particular, teleworking was encouraged over a long period in France and then generalized in April 2021, promoting social isolation. The anxious climate linked to the pandemic and the precipitous nature of this decision induced a new psychosocial risk factor. The psychological manifestations linked to stress: anxiety, depressive disorders and others justify without delay a global action plan with systematic support measures by local management, systematic screening for possible maladjustment by the occupational health services and support people in difficulty. For this purpose and in these circumstances, self-questionnaires, directed questionnaires and video interviews appear to be the most suitable means. The chosen and part-time teleworking making it possible to reconcile family and professional life will remain a solution at certain times of life, but full-time teleworking cannot constitute an univocal and lasting solution.

Indexed as

COVID-19Health plan implementationOccupational healthPsychosocial riskSocial isolationstress.Teleworking

Identifiers

PMID34248143
PMCPMC8253664

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.