ArticleEuropean urology2021
Infant Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty: Outcomes at a Single Institution, and Tips for Safety and Success.
Article in European urology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- Comparison of outcomes of open, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children with pelviureteric junction obstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Translational andrology and urology · 2026Article
- Single Port Robotic Surgery in Benign Urologic Disease - A Review of Contemporary Applications and Outcomes.Current urology reports · 2026Review
- A comparative analysis of retroperitoneal small-incision open pyeloplasty and laparoscopic pyeloplasty for infantile hydronephrosis.Pediatric surgery international · 2026Article
- Two decades of robotic pediatric urology: a single-surgeon evolution from adoption to excellence.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Review
- Laparoscopic pyeloplasty in infants with ureteropelvic junction obstruction managed with the enhanced recovery after surgery approach: a single-center experience.BMC urology · 2025Article
- Optimizing inter-joint distances of robotic forceps for vertical needle driving in pediatric surgery: a virtual reality simulator study.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2025Article
- Comparison of the treatment effect of laparoscopic and robot-assisted single-port laparoscopic pyeloplasty on ureteropelvic junction obstruction in infants.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Article
- Safety and efficacy of robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction in infants under 6 months.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Functional Outcomes After 'SHURUI' Single-Port Robot-Assisted Pyeloplasty for Uretero Pelvic Junction Obstruction: Single-Centre Experience.The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS · 2025Article
- Risk factors for urological infection after laparoscopic ureterolithotomy.American journal of translational research · 2025Article
- Analysis of pathogen distribution and associated risk factors for surgical site infections following laparoscopic urological surgeries.International wound journal · 2024Article
- Cost-effectiveness analysis of robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery for complex pediatric surgical conditions.Surgical endoscopy · 2023Article
- Narrative review: robotic pediatric surgery-current status and future perspectives.Translational pediatrics · 2023Review
- Comparative efficacy and safety of different minimal invasive pyeloplasty in treating patients with ureteropelvic junction obstruction: a network meta-analysis.World journal of urology · 2023Article
- Enhanced recovery management in pediatric pyeloplasty: outcomes in a single institution and tips for improvement.World journal of urology · 2023Article
- Open Pyeloplasty in Infants under 1 Year-Proven or Meaningless?Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- The application of artificial technology in pediatric pyeloplasty the efficacy analysis of robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in the treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2023Article
- Transperitoneal Versus Retroperitoneal Robotic-assisted Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty for Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction in Children. A Multicentre, Prospective Study.European urology open science · 2022Article
- Ensuring safety and feasibility for resection of pediatric benign ovarian tumors by single-port robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery using the da Vinci Xi system.Frontiers in surgery · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSince its first description, multiple reports proved efficacy and safety of the robotic platform. Further progress has been made allowing for the application of robotic surgery to smaller patients, including infants. Despite the early favorable results, the use of robot surgery in infants is still controversial and more studies are needed to confirm its benefits.
objectiveTo our knowledge, we present the largest single-institution case series of robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty (RAL-P) in infants, aiming to contribute to the current literature with a guide for key technical steps and safety tips for infant RAL-P. DESIGN, SETTING, AND
participantsWe performed a retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database. The study protocol was approved by the institutional review board. SURGICAL PROCEDURE: Only infants (≤12 mo of age) with a diagnosis of congenital ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) undergoing primary robotic dismembered pyeloplasty were included in the study. MEASUREMENTS: We critically reviewed the clinical outcomes, described the main steps of the operation, and shared tips for a safe approach. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: From January 2012 to August 2019, 44 infants underwent RAL-P for UPJO--33 (75%) males and 11 (25%) females. All robotic cases were completed successfully, with no laparotomic conversions. The median age and weight were 4 (1-12) mo and 6.8 (3.8-10.5) kg, respectively. The mean operative time was 142 (±25) min. The mean estimated blood loss was 7 (±3.6) ml, and no intraoperative complications occurred. The mean length of hospital stay (LOS) was 1.4 (±0.7) d. Seven (15.6%) patients had postoperative complications-one (2%) ileus (Clavien-Dindo grade [CDG] I), four (9%) urinary tract infections (CDG II), and two (4.5%) port-site hernias (CDG III). At a median follow-up of 19 mo, the success rate was 100%.
conclusionsGiven the successful outcomes, benefits of decreased LOS, and improved cosmesis, RAL-P is an appealing management option for UPJO in infants. Market release of new systems, further miniaturization of instruments, and more affordable costs will hopefully be shedding light on more complex applications. PATIENT SUMMARY: Infants (≤12 mo of age) diagnosed with ureteropelvic junction obstruction undergoing primary robotic dismembered pyeloplasty were selected and included in this study. No intraoperative complications or conversion to an open approach occurred. Seven patients (16%) developed postoperative complications-one (2%) postoperative ileus, four (9%) urinary tract infections, and two (4.5%) port-site hernias. At a median follow-up of 19 (7-66) mo, the success rate was 100%.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.