Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34247895›Full record

ArticleEuropean urology2021

Infant Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty: Outcomes at a Single Institution, and Tips for Safety and Success.

Ciro Andolfi, Veronica M Rodríguez, Logan Galansky, Mohan S Gundeti

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European urology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Risk factors for urological infection after laparoscopic ureterolithotomy.American journal of translational research · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ciro AndolfiPediatric Urology, Section of Urology, Department of Surgery, Comer Children's Hospital, The University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA. Electronic address: ciroandolfi@gmail.com.
Veronica M RodríguezPediatric Urology, Section of Urology, Department of Surgery, Comer Children's Hospital, The University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
Logan GalanskyPediatric Urology, Section of Urology, Department of Surgery, Comer Children's Hospital, The University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
Mohan S GundetiPediatric Urology, Section of Urology, Department of Surgery, Comer Children's Hospital, The University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
Comer Children's Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSince its first description, multiple reports proved efficacy and safety of the robotic platform. Further progress has been made allowing for the application of robotic surgery to smaller patients, including infants. Despite the early favorable results, the use of robot surgery in infants is still controversial and more studies are needed to confirm its benefits.

objectiveTo our knowledge, we present the largest single-institution case series of robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty (RAL-P) in infants, aiming to contribute to the current literature with a guide for key technical steps and safety tips for infant RAL-P. DESIGN, SETTING, AND

participantsWe performed a retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database. The study protocol was approved by the institutional review board. SURGICAL PROCEDURE: Only infants (≤12 mo of age) with a diagnosis of congenital ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) undergoing primary robotic dismembered pyeloplasty were included in the study. MEASUREMENTS: We critically reviewed the clinical outcomes, described the main steps of the operation, and shared tips for a safe approach. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: From January 2012 to August 2019, 44 infants underwent RAL-P for UPJO--33 (75%) males and 11 (25%) females. All robotic cases were completed successfully, with no laparotomic conversions. The median age and weight were 4 (1-12) mo and 6.8 (3.8-10.5) kg, respectively. The mean operative time was 142 (±25) min. The mean estimated blood loss was 7 (±3.6) ml, and no intraoperative complications occurred. The mean length of hospital stay (LOS) was 1.4 (±0.7) d. Seven (15.6%) patients had postoperative complications-one (2%) ileus (Clavien-Dindo grade [CDG] I), four (9%) urinary tract infections (CDG II), and two (4.5%) port-site hernias (CDG III). At a median follow-up of 19 mo, the success rate was 100%.

conclusionsGiven the successful outcomes, benefits of decreased LOS, and improved cosmesis, RAL-P is an appealing management option for UPJO in infants. Market release of new systems, further miniaturization of instruments, and more affordable costs will hopefully be shedding light on more complex applications. PATIENT SUMMARY: Infants (≤12 mo of age) diagnosed with ureteropelvic junction obstruction undergoing primary robotic dismembered pyeloplasty were selected and included in this study. No intraoperative complications or conversion to an open approach occurred. Seven patients (16%) developed postoperative complications-one (2%) postoperative ileus, four (9%) urinary tract infections, and two (4.5%) port-site hernias. At a median follow-up of 19 (7-66) mo, the success rate was 100%.

Indexed as

FemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornIntraoperative ComplicationsKidney PelvisLaparoscopyMalePostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesRobotic Surgical ProceduresTreatment OutcomeUreteral ObstructionUrologic Surgical ProceduresAnderson-HynesHydronephrosisInfantsRobotic pyeloplastyUreteropelvic junctionUreteropelvic junction obstruction

Identifiers

PMID34247895
OpenAlexW3181629548

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.