ReviewOphthalmology2021
International Classification of Retinopathy of Prematurity, Third Edition.
Review in Ophthalmology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 463 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Intranasal Dexmedetomidine for Pain Management During Screening for Retinopathy of Prematurity: a Crossover Randomized Controlled Trial
Evaluation of the Frequency of Retinopathy of Prematurity, Influencing Risk Factors, and Treatment Outcomes in Premature Infants With a Birth Weight >1500 Grams or Gestational Age ≥33 Weeks in Turkey.
The Effect of Dexamethasone Eye Drops on Retinopathy of Prematurity, a Swedish Registry-based Study
Who cites it
463 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 716 citations in OpenAlex.
- Insulin-like growth factor-1 for the prevention or treatment of retinopathy of prematurity.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2026Pooled it
- Macrolides for the prevention of bronchopulmonary dysplasia in preterm neonates.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2026Pooled it
- Refractive outcomes following anti-VEGF, vitrectomy, cryotherapy, and laser photocoagulation for retinopathy of prematurity: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Significance of serum biomarkers in preterm infants screened for retinopathy of prematurity: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Eye (London, England) · 2025Pooled it
- Artificial intelligence-based algorithms for the diagnosis of retinopathy of prematurity.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025Pooled it
- Continuous positive airway pressure versus methylxanthine for apnoea in preterm infants.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025Pooled it
- Deferred cord clamping (DCC) at 1 min versus 3 min in preterm neonates - an open label randomized, controlled trial.European journal of pediatrics · 2026Trial
- A novel double-lumen tracheal tube-assisted InSurE versus LISA in preterm infants with RDS: a multicenter randomized trial.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Trial
- Different ranibizumab dosages for retinopathy of prematurity: 5-year follow-up data of the randomised, controlled CARE-ROP Study.BMJ open ophthalmology · 2025Trial
- Comparison of efficacy between beractant and poractant alfa in respiratory distress syndrome among preterm infants (28-33Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2025Trial
- Cost-Effectiveness of Telemedicine-Based Screening Programs for Retinopathy of Prematurity in Low- and Middle-Income Countries.Ophthalmology science · 2026Article
- Targeted proteomics in late-onset neonatal sepsis: an exploratory analysis.Pediatric research · 2026Article
- Comparison of Two AI Chatbots for Diagnosis and Providing Treatment Suggestions in Retinopathy of Prematurity: Retrospective Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- The role of prophylactic arginine supplementation for prevention of bronchopulmonary dysplasia in extremely preterm infants.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2026Article
- Cost-effectiveness of community-based artificial intelligence screening for retinopathy of prematurity.Journal of global health · 2026Article
- Gestational age references and trajectory of fetal haemoglobin in relation to outcome in neonates born before 30 weeks of gestation: a single-centre retrospective cohort study in The Netherlands.EClinicalMedicine · 2026Article
- Association of retinopathy of prematurity with early refractive development in mid-preterm infants.Eye (London, England) · 2026Article
- Utility of handheld optical coherence tomography imaging in the surgical management of preterm infants with advanced retinopathy of prematurity.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026Article
- Application of a Quantitative Vascular Severity Score in Retinopathy of Prematurity in the United States and India: New Insights Into Disease Epidemiology and Pathophysiology.American journal of ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Electroretinographic assessment of retinal function in preterm infants using the RETeval™ device: a proposal for reference data.Documenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology · 2026Article
403 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on byReply.2022
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
35 authors at 20 institutions in 15 countries.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThe International Classification of Retinopathy of Prematurity is a consensus statement that creates a standard nomenclature for classification of retinopathy of prematurity (ROP). It was initially published in 1984, expanded in 1987, and revisited in 2005. This article presents a third revision, the International Classification of Retinopathy of Prematurity, Third Edition (ICROP3), which is now required because of challenges such as: (1) concerns about subjectivity in critical elements of disease classification; (2) innovations in ophthalmic imaging; (3) novel pharmacologic therapies (e.g., anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agents) with unique regression and reactivation features after treatment compared with ablative therapies; and (4) recognition that patterns of ROP in some regions of the world do not fit neatly into the current classification system.
designReview of evidence-based literature, along with expert consensus opinion.
participantsInternational ROP expert committee assembled in March 2019 representing 17 countries and comprising 14 pediatric ophthalmologists and 20 retinal specialists, as well as 12 women and 22 men.
methodsThe committee was initially divided into 3 subcommittees-acute phase, regression or reactivation, and imaging-each of which used iterative videoconferences and an online message board to identify key challenges and approaches. Subsequently, the entire committee used iterative videoconferences, 2 in-person multiday meetings, and an online message board to develop consensus on classification.
main outcome measuresConsensus statement.
resultsThe ICROP3 retains current definitions such as zone (location of disease), stage (appearance of disease at the avascular-vascular junction), and circumferential extent of disease. Major updates in the ICROP3 include refined classification metrics (e.g., posterior zone II, notch, subcategorization of stage 5, and recognition that a continuous spectrum of vascular abnormality exists from normal to plus disease). Updates also include the definition of aggressive ROP to replace aggressive-posterior ROP because of increasing recognition that aggressive disease may occur in larger preterm infants and beyond the posterior retina, particularly in regions of the world with limited resources. ROP regression and reactivation are described in detail, with additional description of long-term sequelae.
conclusionsThese principles may improve the quality and standardization of ROP care worldwide and may provide a foundation to improve research and clinical care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.