Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34247785›Full record

ArticleApplied nursing research : ANR2021

Nurses' pandemic lives: A mixed-methods study of experiences during COVID-19.

Kathleen Gray, Paulette Dorney, Lori Hoffman, Albert Crawford

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied nursing research : ANR, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 72 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kathleen GrayJefferson College of Nursing, 901 Walnut Street, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA. Electronic address: kathy.gray@jefferson.edu.
Paulette DorneyHelen S. Breidegam School of Nursing, Moravian College, 1200 Main St., Bethlehem, PA 18018, USA. Electronic address: dorneyp@moravian.edu.
Lori HoffmanHelen S. Breidegam School of Nursing, Moravian College, 1200 Main St., Bethlehem, PA 18052, USA. Electronic address: HoffmanL@Moravian.edu.
Albert CrawfordJefferson College of Population Health, 901 Walnut Street, 10(th) floor, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA. Electronic address: albert.crawford@jefferson.edu.
Moravian University · USJefferson College · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe US healthcare settings and staff have been stretched to capacity by the COVID-19 pandemic. While COVID-19 continues to threaten global healthcare delivery systems and populations, its impact on nursing has been profound.

objectivesThis study aimed to document nurses' immediate reactions, major stressors, effective measures to reduce stress, coping strategies, and motivators as they provided care during COVID-19.

designMixed-methods, cross sectional design. Participants responded to objective and open-ended questions on the COVID-19 Nurses' Survey.

participantsThe survey, was sent to nurses employed in health care settings during the pandemic; 110 nurses participated.

resultsImmediate reactions of respondents were nervousness and call of duty; major stressors were uncertainty, inflicting the virus on family, lack of personal protective equipment (PPE), and protocol inconsistencies. Effective measures to reduce stress identified were financial incentives and mental health support. Most frequently used coping strategies were limiting televised news about the virus, talking with family and friends, and information, Motivators to participate in future care included having adequate PPE and sense of duty. Bivariate analysis of outcomes by age group, education, work setting, and marital status was performed. Nurse respondents with higher advanced degrees had significantly less fear than those with BSN-only degrees (p < .05).Of respondents who were married/living with a partner, 85.9% listing "uncertainty about when the pandemic will be under control" as a major stressor (p < .05), while 62.8% of those who were single/divorced/widowed (p = .015) did so. Further, 75% of respondents working in critical care listed "mental health services" as important (p = .054). Four major qualitative themes emerged: What is going on here?; How much worse can this get?; What do I do now?; What motivates me to do future work?

conclusionThe study found nurses were motivated by ethical duty to care for patients with COVID-19 despite risk to self and family, leaving nurses vulnerable to moral distress and burnout. This research articulates the need for psychological support, self- care initiatives, adequate protection, information, and process improvements in the healthcare systems to reduce the risk of moral distress, injury and burnout among nurses.

Indexed as

COVID-19NursesPandemicsAdolescentAdultCross-Sectional StudiesHumansMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited StatesYoung AdultCoronavirusCOVID-19DutyFearMoral distressNursingPandemicStress

Identifiers

PMID34247785
PMCPMC8078035
OpenAlexW3158048767

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.