Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34247658›Full record

ArticleJournal of animal science and biotechnology2021

Dietary sophorolipid accelerates growth by modulation of gut microbiota population and intestinal environments in broiler chickens.

Min-Jin Kwak, Min-Young Park, Yong-Soon Choi, Junghwan Cho, Duleepa Pathiraja, Jonggun Kim, Hanbae Lee, In-Geol Choi, Kwang-Youn Whang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of animal science and biotechnology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Min-Jin Kwak *Department of Biotechnology, Korea University, 145 Anam-ro, Seoul, 02841, Republic of Korea.
Min-Young Park *Department of Biotechnology, Korea University, 145 Anam-ro, Seoul, 02841, Republic of Korea.
Yong-Soon ChoiDepartment of Biotechnology, Korea University, 145 Anam-ro, Seoul, 02841, Republic of Korea.
Junghwan ChoDepartment of Biotechnology, Korea University, 145 Anam-ro, Seoul, 02841, Republic of Korea.
Duleepa PathirajaDepartment of Biotechnology, Korea University, 145 Anam-ro, Seoul, 02841, Republic of Korea.
Jonggun KimDepartment of Biotechnology, Korea University, 145 Anam-ro, Seoul, 02841, Republic of Korea.
Hanbae LeePathway Intermediates, Seoul, 02841, Republic of Korea.
In-Geol ChoiDepartment of Biotechnology, Korea University, 145 Anam-ro, Seoul, 02841, Republic of Korea.
Kwang-Youn WhangDepartment of Biotechnology, Korea University, 145 Anam-ro, Seoul, 02841, Republic of Korea. kwhang@korea.ac.kr.
Korea University · KR

Funding

Pathway intermediates Q1813691
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGut is a crucial organ for the host's defense system due to its filtering action of the intestinal membrane from hazardous foreign substances. One strategy to strengthen the gut epithelial barrier function is to upregulate beneficial microflora populations and their metabolites. Sophorolipid (SPL), which is a glycolipid bio-surfactant, could increase beneficial microflora and decrease pathogenic bacteria in the gastrointestinal tract. Therefore, herein, we conducted an experiment with broiler chickens to investigate the fortifying effects of SPL on the host's gut defense system by modulating the microbiota population.

methodsA total of 540 1-day-old chicks (Ross 308) were used, and they were immediately allotted into three treatment groups (6 replications with 30 chicks/pen) according to their initial body weight. The dietary treatments consisted of CON (basal diet), BAM (10 mg/kg bambermycin), and SPL (10 mg/kg SPL). During the experiment, birds freely accessed feed and water, and body weight and feed intake were measured at the end of each phase. On d 35, birds (one bird/pen) were sacrificed to collect jejunum and cecum samples.

resultsDietary SPL and BAM supplementation significantly accelerated birds' growth and also significantly improved feed efficiency compared to CON. Intestinal microbial community was significantly separated by dietary SPL supplementation from that of CON, and dietary SPL supplementation significantly increased Lactobacillus spp. and Akkermansia muciniphila. Moreover, birds fed with dietary SPL also showed the highest concentration of cecal butyrate among all treatment groups. Gut morphological analysis showed that dietary SPL significantly increased villus height, ratio of villus height to crypt depth, goblet cell numbers, and the gene expression levels of claudin-1 and mucin 2. Additionally, dietary SPL significantly decreased the mRNA expression level of pro-inflammatory cytokine, interleukin-6, and increased that of anti-inflammatory cytokine, interleukin-10, compared to other treatments.

conclusionsDietary SPL increases the beneficial bacterial population and butyrate concentration, which leads to a strengthened gut barrier function. In addition, the intestinal inflammation was also downregulated by dietary SPL supplementation.

Indexed as

BroilersGut microbiotaGut morphologyLocal inflammationMucus barrierSophorolipids

Identifiers

PMID34247658
PMCPMC8274033
OpenAlexW3181369245

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.