Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34247580›Full record

Trial reportBMC cancer2021

Beta-hydroxy beta-methylbutyrate/arginine/glutamine (HMB/Arg/Gln) supplementation to improve the management of cachexia in patients with advanced lung cancer: an open-label, multicentre, randomised, controlled phase II trial (NOURISH).

Jennifer Pascoe, Aimee Jackson, Charlotte Gaskell, Claire Gaunt, Joyce Thompson, Lucinda Billingham, Neil Steven

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC cancer, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
10.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 97 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Body composition alterations in patients with lung cancer.American journal of physiology. Cell physiology · 2025
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Jennifer PascoeQueen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Mindelsohn Way, Birmingham, B15 2TH, UK.
Aimee JacksonCancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit (CRCTU), University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.
Charlotte GaskellCancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit (CRCTU), University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.
Claire GauntCancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit (CRCTU), University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.
Joyce ThompsonBirmingham Heartlands Hospital, Bordesley Green E, Birmingham, B9 5SS, UK.
Lucinda Billingham *Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit (CRCTU), University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK. L.J.Billingham@bham.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8581-4262
Neil Steven *Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.
Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit · GBHeartlands Hospital · GBQueen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham · GBUniversity of Birmingham · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK 25354
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCancer cachexia causes significant morbidity and mortality in advanced lung cancer patients. Clinical benefit of β-hydroxy-β-methylbutyrate, arginine, and glutamine (HMB/Arg/Gln) was assessed in newly diagnosed patients.

methodsNOURISH, a prospective, two-arm, open-label, multi-centre, randomised controlled phase II trial compared cachexia in patients who received HMB/Arg/Gln with those who did not. All patients received structured nutritional, exercise and symptom control via a Macmillan Durham Cachexia Pack. Conducted in five UK centres, patients aged > 18 years, with newly diagnosed advanced small cell lung cancer (SCLC) or non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), who were able to take oral nutrition, with a performance status of 0-to-2 and a life expectancy > 4 months were eligible for trial entry. Patients suitable for treatment with curative intent were ineligible. The trial was designed as a signal-seeking pilot study with target recruitment of 96 patients. One-to-one randomisation was stratified by diagnosis (SCLC or NSCLC), stage of disease (locally advanced or metastatic) and performance status. The primary outcome measure was treatment success defined as a patient being alive without significant loss of lean body mass (not > 5%) by 12 weeks. Secondary outcome measures included quality of life.

resultsBetween February-2012 and February-2013, 38 patients were recruited, 19 to each arm. Baseline characteristics were balanced. The trial was halted due to slow accrual and partial adherence. Trial data demonstrated no evidence of treatment benefit. No serious adverse events were reported during the trial.

conclusionsFurther evaluation of HMB/Arg/Gln in this setting could not be recommended on the basis of this trial. CLINICAL

trial registrationISRCTN registry: 39911673; 14-Apr-2011 https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN39911673 .

Indexed as

ArginineCachexiaFemaleGlutamineHumansLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesTreatment OutcomeArginineGlutamineAdvanced lung cancerCachexiaClinical trialNutritional supplementSupportive care

Identifiers

PMID34247580
PMCPMC8274132
OpenAlexW3178593966

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.