Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34247307›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical monitoring and computing2022

Outcome in patients with open abdomen treatment for peritonitis: a multidomain approach outperforms single domain predictions.

Sven Petersen, Markus Huber, Federico Storni, Gero Puhl, Alice Deder, Axel Prause, Joerg C Schefold, Dietrich Doll, Patrick Schober, Markus M Luedi

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical monitoring and computing, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Predicting outcome in abdominal sepsis: putting the puzzle together.Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Sven PetersenDepartment of General and Visceral Surgery, Asklepios Hospital Altona, Hamburg, Germany.
Markus HuberDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Freiburgstrasse, 3010, Bern, Switzerland.
Federico StorniDepartment of Visceral Surgery and Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Gero PuhlDepartment of General and Visceral Surgery, Asklepios Hospital Altona, Hamburg, Germany.
Alice DederDepartment of General and Visceral Surgery, Asklepios Hospital Altona, Hamburg, Germany.
Axel PrauseDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Asklepios Hospital Altona, Hamburg, Germany.
Joerg C SchefoldDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Dietrich DollDepartment of Procto-Surgery, St. Marien-Krankenhaus Vechta, Vechta, Germany.
Patrick SchoberDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Markus M LuediDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Freiburgstrasse, 3010, Bern, Switzerland. markus.luedi2@insel.ch.
Asklepios Klinik Altona · DEUniversity Hospital of Bern · CHUniversity of Bern · CHUniversity of Vechta · DEVrije Universiteit Amsterdam · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Numerous patient-related clinical parameters and treatment-specific variables have been identified as causing or contributing to the severity of peritonitis. We postulated that a combination of clinical and surgical markers and scoring systems would outperform each of these predictors in isolation. To investigate this hypothesis, we developed a multivariable model to examine whether survival outcome can reliably be predicted in peritonitis patients treated with open abdomen. This single-center retrospective analysis used univariable and multivariable logistic regression modeling in combination with repeated random sub-sampling validation to examine the predictive capabilities of domain-specific predictors (i.e., demography, physiology, surgery). We analyzed data of 1,351 consecutive adult patients (55.7% male) who underwent open abdominal surgery in the study period (January 1998 to December 2018). Core variables included demographics, clinical scores, surgical indices and indicators of organ dysfunction, peritonitis index, incision type, fascia closure, wound healing, and fascial dehiscence. Postoperative complications were also added when available. A multidomain peritonitis prediction model (MPPM) was constructed to bridge the mortality predictions from individual domains (demographic, physiological and surgical). The MPPM is based on data of n = 597 patients, features high predictive capabilities (area under the receiver operating curve: 0.87 (0.85 to 0.90, 95% CI)) and is well calibrated. The surgical predictor "skin closure" was found to be the most important predictor of survival in our cohort, closely followed by the two physiological predictors SAPS-II and MPI. Marginal effects plots highlight the effect of individual outcomes on the prediction of survival outcome in patients undergoing staged laparotomies for treatment of peritonitis. Although most single indices exhibited moderate performance, we observed that the predictive performance was markedly increased when an integrative prediction model was applied. Our proposed MPPM integrative prediction model may outperform the predictive power of current models.

Indexed as

Open Abdomen TechniquesPeritonitisAbdomenAdultFemaleHumansLaparotomyMaleRetrospective StudiesDecision supportMortalityMPI scoreOpen abdomenPeritonitisSAPS-II score

Identifiers

PMID34247307
PMCPMC9294021
OpenAlexW3179163951

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.