Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34247292›Full record

ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2021

Description of spine motion during gait in normal adolescents and young adults.

Solène Prost, Benjamin Blondel, Vincent Pomero, Guillaume Authier, Christophe Boulay, Jean Luc Jouve, Sebastien Pesenti

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Solène ProstGait Analysis Platform, Timone enfants, Aix-Marseille Université, Marseille, France.
Benjamin BlondelGait Analysis Platform, Timone enfants, Aix-Marseille Université, Marseille, France.
Vincent PomeroGait Analysis Platform, Timone enfants, Aix-Marseille Université, Marseille, France.
Guillaume AuthierGait Analysis Platform, Timone enfants, Aix-Marseille Université, Marseille, France.
Christophe BoulayGait Analysis Platform, Timone enfants, Aix-Marseille Université, Marseille, France.
Jean Luc JouveGait Analysis Platform, Timone enfants, Aix-Marseille Université, Marseille, France.
Sebastien PesentiGait Analysis Platform, Timone enfants, Aix-Marseille Université, Marseille, France. seb.pesenti@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-2230-2811

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionStanding radiographs allow analysis of spinal segments and their relative positioning. However, it requires a specific positioning influencing spinal alignment. Knowledge of trunk movements when walking is therefore an essential step to evaluate dynamic sagittal balance. Our objective was to define spinal junction kinematics and their correlations during gait in a healthy population.

methodThis is a prospective, single-center study. Between 2015 and 2017, 25 healthy volunteers were included. The measurements were taken in a motion analysis laboratory. Several kinematic parameters were studied, including spinal junction movements in the three planes and dynamic sagittal vertical axis (Dyn-SVA). Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated to determine the interactions between the spinal junctions.

resultsIn the sagittal plane, the average amplitude of variation of the dyn-SVA was 25.5 cm (SD = 8.9). The average range of motion of the lumbosacral and thoracolumbar junction was approximately 3°, they operated in anti-phase during the gait cycle and were strongly correlated (r = -0.5069, p = 0.01). In the transverse plane, the anti-rotation of the upper body relative to the pelvis was mainly ensured by the opposite movements of the lumbosacral and thoracolumbar junction (r = 0.5689, p = 0.003). In the frontal plane, the lateral inclination in the lumbar region was made in the opposite direction from the pelvis toward the carrying member.

conclusionAlthough there is substantial inter-subject variability, our study characterized the angular movements in the three planes of the different spinal junctions, of the pelvis and the lower limbs during a gait cycle in a healthy population.

Indexed as

GaitSpineAdolescentHumansProspective StudiesRange of Motion, ArticularWalkingYoung AdultDynamic sagittal balanceGait cycleSpinal junctionTrunk motion

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.