Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34247269›Full record

SynthesisArchives of women's mental health2022

A systematic review of screening for perinatal depression and anxiety in community-based settings.

Amritha Bhat, Arjun Nanda, Lauren Murphy, Andrea L Ball, John Fortney, Jodie Katon

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Archives of women's mental health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Integrating perinatal mental health into primary health care in Belize.Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Mixed-Methods Assessment of Maternal Anxiety During the First 8 Weeks After Birth.Journal of obstetric, gynecologic, and neonatal nursing : JOGNN · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Amritha BhatDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA. amritha@uw.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9284-0650
Arjun NandaDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Keck School of Medicine at University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Lauren MurphyCollege of Medicine - Tucson, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
Andrea L BallMultiCare Institute for Research and Innovation, Tacoma, WA, USA.
John FortneyDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Jodie KatonVA Puget Sound Health Care System, WA, Seattle, USA.
University of Washington · USMultiCare Health System · USUniversity of Arizona · USUniversity of Southern California · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Screening for perinatal depression and anxiety in community-based maternal and child health settings may help close the detection and treatment gap among women at higher risk for these conditions. We aim to review perinatal depression and anxiety screening tools, timing, and follow-up processes for positive screens in community-based settings. We conducted a systematic review of the literature to identify papers describing screening and interventions for perinatal depression and anxiety in community-based settings. We identified 49 papers describing 47 studies of perinatal depression or anxiety screening in community-based settings. The Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) was the most frequently used screening tool. Referral and referral tracking for those who screened positive for symptoms were inadequately described. Types of training and technical assistance provided for screening varied widely. It is feasible and acceptable to screen for perinatal depression in community settings, but there is a need for systematic research examining which screening tools to use, the ideal frequency of screening, and referral completion rates. There is a lack of information regarding perinatal anxiety screening and a lack of uniformity in training regarding screening in community-based settings. Future studies should compare the efficacy of screening in community-based settings to screening in healthcare settings.

Indexed as

DepressionDepression, PostpartumAnxietyAnxiety DisordersChildFemaleHumansMass ScreeningPregnancyPsychiatric Status Rating ScalesCommunity-basedPerinatal anxietyPerinatal depressionScreening

Identifiers

PMID34247269
OpenAlexW3179063023

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.