Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34247193›Full record

ArticleModern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc2021

Clinicopathological and genomic features in patients with head and neck neuroendocrine carcinoma.

Akihiro Ohmoto, Yukiko Sato, Reimi Asaka, Naoki Fukuda, Xiaofei Wang, Tetsuya Urasaki, Naomi Hayashi, Yasuyoshi Sato, Kenji Nakano, Mayu Yunokawa and 7 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of the Head and Neck: A Two-Decade Institutional Experience.World journal of otorhinolaryngology - head and neck surgery · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Akihiro OhmotoDivision of Medical Oncology, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.
Yukiko SatoDivision of Pathology, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-4277-0161
Reimi AsakaDivision of Pathology, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.
Naoki FukudaDivision of Medical Oncology, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.
Xiaofei WangDivision of Medical Oncology, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.
Tetsuya UrasakiDivision of Medical Oncology, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.
Naomi HayashiDivision of Medical Oncology, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.
Yasuyoshi SatoDivision of Medical Oncology, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.
Kenji NakanoDivision of Medical Oncology, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.
Mayu YunokawaDivision of Medical Oncology, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.
Makiko OnoDivision of Medical Oncology, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.
Junichi TomomatsuDivision of Medical Oncology, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.
Takashi ToshiyasuDivision of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.
Hiroki MitaniDivision of Head and Neck Oncology, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.
Kengo TakeuchiDivision of Pathology, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-1599-5800
Seiichi MoriProject for Development of Innovative Research, Cancer Precision Medicine Center, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.
Shunji TakahashiDivision of Medical Oncology, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan. s.takahashi-chemotherapy@jfcr.or.jp.
Japanese Foundation For Cancer Research · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) of the head and neck is a rare type of malignancy, accounting for only 0.3% of all head and neck cancers, and its clinicopathological and genomic features have not been fully characterized. We conducted a retrospective analysis of 27 patients with poorly differentiated NEC of the head and neck seen at our institution over a period of 15 years. Patient characteristics, adopted therapies, and clinical outcomes were reviewed based on the medical records. Pathological analysis and targeted sequencing of 523 cancer-related genes were performed using evaluable biopsied/resected specimens based on the clinical data. The most common tumor locations were the paranasal sinus (33%) and the oropharynx (19%). Eighty-one percent of the patients had locally advanced disease. The 3-year overall survival rates in all patients and in the 17 patients with locally advanced disease who received multimodal curative treatments were 39% and 53%, respectively. Histologically, large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma was the predominant subtype (58% of evaluable cases), and the Ki-67 labeling index ranged from 59 to 99% (median: 85%). Next-generation sequencing in 14 patients identified pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants in TP53, RB1, PIK3CA-related genes (PREX2, PIK3CA, and PTEN), NOTCH1, and SMARCA4 in six (43%), three (21%), two (14%), two (14%), and one (7%) patients, respectively. Sequencing also detected the FGFR3-TACC3 fusion gene in one patient. The median value of the total mutational burden (TMB) was 7.1/Mb, and three patients had TMB ≥ 10. Regardless of the aggressive pathological features, our data revealed favorable clinical characteristics in the patients with locally advanced disease who received curative treatment. The lower TP53 and RB1 mutation prevalence rates compared to those described for small cell lung cancer suggests the biological heterogeneity of NEC in different parts of the body. Furthermore, the FGFR3-TACC3 fusion gene and mutations in genes encoding the components of the NOTCH and PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathways found in our study may be promising targets for NEC of the head and neck.

Indexed as

GenomicsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkers, TumorCarcinoma, NeuroendocrineFemaleHead and Neck NeoplasmsHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansIn Situ HybridizationMaleMicrotubule-Associated ProteinsMiddle AgedMutationNeoplasm ProteinsBiomarkers, TumorFGFR3 protein, humanMicrotubule-Associated ProteinsNeoplasm ProteinsRB1 protein, humanReceptor, Fibroblast Growth Factor, Type 3Recombinant Fusion ProteinsRetinoblastoma Binding ProteinsTACC3 protein, humanTP53 protein, humanTumor Suppressor Protein p53Ubiquitin-Protein Ligases

Identifiers

PMID34247193
PMCPMC8514330
OpenAlexW3180730958

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.