Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34246947›Full record

SynthesisJournal of affective disorders2021

A systematic review of the prevalence of anxiety among the general population during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Fatemeh Pashazadeh Kan, Samira Raoofi, Sima Rafiei, Saghar Khani, Hossein Hosseinifard, Fatemeh Tajik, Neda Raoofi, Saba Ahmadi, Sepideh Aghalou, Fatemeh Torabi and 4 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · greenAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of affective disorders, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 71 papers, 10 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
71citing papers in PubMed, 10 pooled it
18.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

71 citing papers in PubMed, 10 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 156 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. The Influence of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Social Anxiety: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Anxiety Linked to COVID-19: A Systematic Review Comparing Anxiety Rates in Different Populations.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Pooled it
  10. COVID-19 pandemic effects on health worker's mental health: Systematic review and meta-analysis.European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2022
    Pooled it
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

11 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Fatemeh Pashazadeh KanHealth Management and Economics Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Samira RaoofiStudent Research Committee, Faculty of Health Management and Information Sciences Branch, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Sima RafieiSocial determinants of health research center, Qazvin University of Medical Sciences, Qazvin, Iran.
Saghar KhaniStudent Research Committee, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Hossein HosseinifardDepartment of Biostatistics, Faculty of Paramedical Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Fatemeh TajikOncopathology Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Neda RaoofiKermanshah Cardiovascular Research Center, Kermanshah, Iran.
Saba AhmadiStudent Research Committee, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Sepideh AghalouPsychiatric Research Center, Roozbeh Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Fatemeh TorabiStudent Research Committee, Faculty of Health Management and Information Sciences Branch, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Afsaneh DehnadSchool of Health Management and Information Sciences, Center for Educational Research in Medical Sciences (CERMS), Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Sepide RezaeiStudent Research Committee, Faculty of Health Management and Information Sciences Branch, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Zahra HosseinipalangiStudent Research Committee, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Ahmad GhashghaeeSocial Determinants of Health Research Center, Research Institute for Prevention of Non-communicable Disease, Qazvin University of Medical Sciences, Qazvin, Iran. Electronic address: ahmad.ghashghaee1996@gmail.com.
Iran University of Medical Sciences · IRQazvin University of Medical Sciences · IRRoozbeh Hospital · IRShahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic has had an adverse effect on the mental health of population worldwide. This study was conducted to systematically review the existing literature to identify the individuals at higher risk of anxiety with a view to provide targeted mental health services during this outbreak.

methodsIn this study, the studies focusing on anxiety prevalence among the general population during the COVID-19 pandemic were searched in the PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science (WoS) and Google Scholar from the beginning of Covid-19 pandemic to February 2021.

results103 studies constituting 140732 people included in the review. The findings showed that anxiety prevalence was 27.3% (95% CI, 23.7%; 31.2%) among general population while the prevalence in COVID-19 patients was 39.6% (95% CI, 30.1%; 50.1%). Anxiety was significantly higher among females and older adults (p≤0.05). In addition Europe revealed the highest prevalence of anxiety 54.6% (95% CI, 42.5%; 66.2%) followed by America 31.5% (95% CI, 19%; 47.5%) and Asia 28.3% (95% CI, 20.3%; 38%). In the general population the highest prevalence of anxiety was in Africa 61.8% (95% CI, 57%-66.4%) followed by America 34.9% (95% CI, 27.7%-42.9%), Europe 30.7% (95% CI, 22.8%-40%) and Asia 24.5% (95% CI, 20.7%-28.9%).

conclusionDuring the COVID-19 crisis, through identifying those who are more likely to be suffered from mental disorders at different layers of populations, it would be possible to apply appropriate supportive interventions with a view to provide targeted mental health services during the outbreak.

Indexed as

COVID-19PandemicsAgedAnxietyDepressionFemaleHumansPrevalenceSARS-CoV-2AnxietyCovid-19Meta-analysisPeopleSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID34246947
PMCPMC8712560
OpenAlexW3180270989

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.