Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34246788›Full record

ArticleJournal of proteomics2021

Deep learning for peptide identification from metaproteomics datasets.

Shichao Feng, Ryan Sterzenbach, Xuan Guo

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of proteomics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. SEMQuant: Extending Sipros-Ensemble with Match-Between-Runs for Comprehensive Quantitative Metaproteomics.Bioinformatics research and applications : ... international symposium, ISBRA ... proceedings. ISBRA (Conference) · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Shichao FengDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, University of North Texas, TX, USA.
Ryan SterzenbachDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of North Texas, TX, USA.
Xuan GuoDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, University of North Texas, TX, USA. Electronic address: xuan.guo@unt.edu.
University of North Texas · US

Funding

A Computational Framework for Protein Identification and Quantification in Metaproteomics Using Data-Independent AcquisitionR15LM013460 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS · PI GUO, XUAN · 2020 to 2020
$361k
NLM NIH HHS R15 LM013460
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Metaproteomics is becoming widely used in microbiome research for gaining insights into the functional state of the microbial community. Current metaproteomics studies are generally based on high-throughput tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) coupled with liquid chromatography. In this paper, we proposed a deep-learning-based algorithm, named DeepFilter, for improving peptide identifications from a collection of tandem mass spectra. The key advantage of the DeepFilter is that it does not need ad hoc training or fine-tuning as in existing filtering tools. DeepFilter is freely available under the GNU GPL license at https://github.com/Biocomputing-Research-Group/DeepFilter. SIGNIFICANCE: The identification of peptides and proteins from MS data involves the computational procedure of searching MS/MS spectra against a predefined protein sequence database and assigning top-scored peptides to spectra. Existing computational tools are still far from being able to extract all the information out of MS/MS data sets acquired from metaproteome samples. Systematical experiment results demonstrate that the DeepFilter identified up to 12% and 9% more peptide-spectrum-matches and proteins, respectively, compared with existing filtering algorithms, including Percolator, Q-ranker, PeptideProphet, and iProphet, on marine and soil microbial metaproteome samples with false discovery rate at 1%. The taxonomic analysis shows that DeepFilter found up to 7%, 10%, and 14% more species from marine, soil, and human gut samples compared with existing filtering algorithms. Therefore, DeepFilter was believed to generalize properly to new, previously unseen peptide-spectrum-matches and can be readily applied in peptide identification from metaproteomics data.

Indexed as

Deep LearningTandem Mass SpectrometryAlgorithmsDatabases, ProteinPeptidesProteomicsPeptidesCNNDeep learningPeptide identificationTandem mass spectrometry

Identifiers

PMID34246788
PMCPMC8435027
OpenAlexW3179513490

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.