ArticleBiophysical journal2021
Robustness and the evolution of length control strategies in the T3SS and flagellar hook.
Article in Biophysical journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bacterial cells construct many structures, such as the flagellar hook and the type III secretion system (T3SS) injectisome, that aid in crucial physiological processes such as locomotion and pathogenesis. Both of these structures involve long extracellular channels, and the length of these channels must be highly regulated in order for these structures to perform their intended functions. There are two leading models for how length control is achieved in the flagellar hook and T3SS needle: the substrate switching model, in which the length is controlled by assembly of an inner rod, and the ruler model, in which a molecular ruler controls the length. Although there is qualitative experimental evidence to support both models, comparatively little has been done to quantitatively characterize these mechanisms or make detailed predictions that could be used to unambiguously test these mechanisms experimentally. In this work, we constructed a mathematical model of length control based on the ruler mechanism and found that the predictions of this model are consistent with experimental data-not just for the scaling of the average length with the ruler protein length, but also for the variance. Interestingly, we found that the ruler mechanism allows for the evolution of needles with large average lengths without the concomitant large increase in variance that occurs in the substrate switching mechanism. In addition to making further predictions that can be tested experimentally, these findings shed new light on the trade-offs that may have led to the evolution of different length control mechanisms in different bacterial species.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.