ReviewEuropean urology focus2021
Rethinking Autonomous Surgery: Focusing on Enhancement over Autonomy.
Review in European urology focus, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparative meta-analysis of robot- and video-assisted surgery for thymoma: efficacy, learning curve, and economic burden in 7347 patients.World journal of surgical oncology · 2025Pooled it
- Configurations of human-centered AI at work: seven actor-structure engagements in organizations.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2023Pooled it
- Article
- Applications of Reinforcement Learning for Autonomous Surgical Robotics: A Systematic Review.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- In-depth characterization of a laparoscopic radical prostatectomy procedure based on surgical process modeling.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2026Article
- Safety and feasibility of solo surgery using a novel robotic platform: an IDEAL 2a development study.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Observational
- Robotic-Assisted Vascular Surgery: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Advancing spine surgery: Evaluating the potential for full robotic automation.Brain & spine · 2025Review
- A surgical activity model of laparoscopic cholecystectomy for co-operation with collaborative robots.Surgical endoscopy · 2024Article
- Robotic Assistance in Percutaneous Liver Ablation Therapies: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches · 2024Article
- In the Hands of a Robot, From the Operating Room to the Courtroom: The Medicolegal Considerations of Robotic Surgery.Cureus · 2023Review
- Recognition and Prediction of Surgical Gestures and Trajectories Using Transformer Models in Robot-Assisted Surgery.Proceedings of the ... IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems · 2022Article
- U-Hack Med Gap Year-A Virtual Undergraduate Internship Program in Computer-Assisted Healthcare and Biomedical Research.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2021Article
- Artificial intelligence in modern clinical practice (Review).Medicine internationalReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
contextAs robot-assisted surgery is increasingly used in surgical care, the engineering research effort towards surgical automation has also increased significantly. Automation promises to enhance surgical outcomes, offload mundane or repetitive tasks, and improve workflow. However, we must ask an important question: should autonomous surgery be our long-term goal?
objectiveTo provide an overview of the engineering requirements for automating control systems, summarize technical challenges in automated robotic surgery, and review sensing and modeling techniques to capture real-time human behaviors for integration into the robotic control loop for enhanced shared or collaborative control. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: We performed a nonsystematic search of the English language literature up to March 25, 2021. We included original studies related to automation in robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery and human-centered sensing and modeling. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: We identified four comprehensive review papers that present techniques for automating portions of surgical tasks. Sixteen studies relate to human-centered sensing technologies and 23 to computer vision and/or advanced artificial intelligence or machine learning methods for skill assessment. Twenty-two studies evaluate or review the role of haptic or adaptive guidance during some learning task, with only a few applied to robotic surgery. Finally, only three studies discuss the role of some form of training in patient outcomes and none evaluated the effects of full or semi-autonomy on patient outcomes.
conclusionsRather than focusing on autonomy, which eliminates the surgeon from the loop, research centered on more fully understanding the surgeon's behaviors, goals, and limitations could facilitate a superior class of collaborative surgical robots that could be more effective and intelligent than automation alone. PATIENT SUMMARY: We reviewed the literature for studies on automation in surgical robotics and on modeling of human behavior in human-machine interaction. The main application is to enhance the ability of surgical robotic systems to collaborate more effectively and intelligently with human surgeon operators.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.