Trial reportJACC. Heart failure2021
Lung Ultrasound-Guided Emergency Department Management of Acute Heart Failure (BLUSHED-AHF): A Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial.
Trial report in JACC. Heart failure, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT03136198 (B-lines Lung Ultrasound Guided ED Management of Acute Heart Failure Pilot Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 43 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
B-lines Lung Ultrasound Guided ED Management of Acute Heart Failure Pilot Trial
Who cites it
43 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 63 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical and utilization outcomes with short stay units vs hospital admission for lower risk decompensated heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Heart failure reviews · 2024Pooled it
- Lung ultrasound-guided treatment for heart failure: An updated meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Pooled it
- The prognostic value of improving congestion on lung ultrasound during treatment for acute heart failure differs based on patient characteristics at admission.Journal of cardiology · 2024Trial
- Point-of-care echocardiography of the right heart improves acute heart failure risk stratification for low-risk patients: The REED-AHF prospective study.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2022Trial
- Ultrasound-guided management in heart failure: A systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating lung and inferior vena cava ultrasound for reducing readmissions and mortality.American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice · 2026Article
- Beyond clinical congestion in acute heart failure: integrating lung ultrasound, venous doppler, and echocardiographic hemodynamics for imaging-guided decongestion.Heart failure reviews · 2026Review
- Article
- Advances in thoracic ultrasound.The European respiratory journal · 2026Article
- Assessing congestion in heart failure: tools are already available, but integration is key.Heart failure reviews · 2026Review
- Advances in Congestion Assessment in Decompensated Heart Failure.Cardiac failure review · 2026Review
- Lung ultrasound in nephrology: Basics, applications, limitations, and future directions.World journal of nephrology · 2025Review
- Lung ultrasound in cardiac rehabilitation: expert consensus on protocols, clinical use, and integration into patient management from the working group on cardiac rehabilitation and cardiovascular prevention of the Italian society of cardiology.Heart failure reviews · 2025Review
- Emerging use of pulmonary artery and cardiac pressure sensing technology in the management of worsening heart failure events.Heart failure reviews · 2025Review
- Lung and Inferior Vena Cava Point-of-Care Ultrasonography, NT-Pro-BNP, and Discharge Body Weight as Predictors of Rehospitalization in Acute Heart Failure.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- ESICM-ESPNIC international expert consensus on quantitative lung ultrasound in intensive care.Intensive care medicine · 2025Article
- Interest of Lung Ultrasound in the Management of Acute Heart Failure in Post-Emergency Service.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Assessment of Decongestion Status Before Discharge in Acute Decompensated Heart Failure: A Review of Clinical, Biochemical, and Imaging Tools and Their Impact on Management Decisions.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Review
- Contemporary Perspectives on Congestion in Heart Failure: Bridging Classic Signs with Evolving Diagnostic and Therapeutic Strategies.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- The diagnostic performance of automatic B-lines detection for evaluating pulmonary edema in the emergency department among novice point-of-care ultrasound practitioners.Emergency radiology · 2025Article
- Ultrasound imaging of congestion in heart failure: a narrative review.Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Erratum issuedCorrection.2024
Authors and funding
10 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesThe goal of this study was to determine whether a 6-hour lung ultrasound (LUS)-guided strategy-of-care improves pulmonary congestion over usual management in the emergency department (ED) setting. A secondary goal was to explore whether early targeted intervention leads to improved outcomes.
backgroundTargeting pulmonary congestion in acute heart failure remains a key goal of care. LUS B-lines are a semi-quantitative assessment of pulmonary congestion. Whether B-lines decrease in patients with acute heart failure by targeting therapy is not well known.
methodsA multicenter, single-blind, ED-based, pilot trial randomized 130 patients to receive a 6-hour LUS-guided treatment strategy versus structured usual care. Patients were followed up throughout hospitalization and 90 days' postdischarge. B-lines ≤15 at 6 h was the primary outcome, and days alive and out of hospital (DAOOH) at 30 days was the main exploratory outcome.
resultsNo significant difference in the proportion of patients with B-lines ≤15 at 6 hours (25.0% LUS vs 27.5% usual care; P = 0.83) or the number of B-lines at 6 hours (35.4 ± 26.8 LUS vs 34.3 ± 26.2 usual care; P = 0.82) was observed between groups. There were also no differences in DAOOH (21.3 ± 6.6 LUS vs 21.3 ± 7.1 usual care; P = 0.99). However, a significantly greater reduction in the number of B-lines was observed in LUS-guided patients compared with those receiving usual structured care during the first 48 hours (P = 0.04).
conclusionsIn this pilot trial, ED use of LUS to target pulmonary congestion conferred no benefit compared with usual care in reducing the number of B-lines at 6 hours or in 30 days DAOOH. However, LUS-guided patients had faster resolution of congestion during the initial 48 hours. (B-lines Lung Ultrasound-Guided ED Management of Acute Heart Failure Pilot Trial; NCT03136198).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.