Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34246501›Full record

ArticleHealth policy (Amsterdam, Netherlands)2022

Providing health services effectively during the first wave of COVID-19: A cross-country comparison on planning services, managing cases, and maintaining essential services.

Erin Webb, Cristina Hernández-Quevedo, Gemma Williams, Giada Scarpetti, Sarah Reed, Dimitra Panteli

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health policy (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Erin WebbDepartment of Health Care Management, Berlin University of Technology, Berlin, Germany; European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies; Department of Health Care Management, Berlin University of Technology, Berlin, Germany. Electronic address: e.webb@tu-berlin.de.
Cristina Hernández-QuevedoEuropean Observatory on Health Systems and Policies; London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK.
Gemma WilliamsEuropean Observatory on Health Systems and Policies; London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK.
Giada ScarpettiDepartment of Health Care Management, Berlin University of Technology, Berlin, Germany; European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies; Department of Health Care Management, Berlin University of Technology, Berlin, Germany.
Sarah ReedNuffield Trust, London, UK.
Dimitra PanteliEuropean Observatory on Health Systems and Policies, Brussels, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic triggered abrupt challenges for health care providers, requiring them to simultaneously plan for and manage a rise of COVID-19 cases while maintaining essential health services. Since March 2020, the COVID-19 Health System Response Monitor, a joint initiative of the European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies, the WHO Regional Office for Europe, and the European Commission, has documented country responses to COVID-19 using a structured template which includes a section on provision of care. Using the information available on the platform, this paper analyzes how countries planned services for potential surge capacity, designed patient flows ensuring separation between COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 patients, and maintained routine services in both hospital and ambulatory settings. Despite very real differences in the organization of health and care services, there were many similarities in country responses. These include transitioning the management of COVID-19 mild cases from hospitals to outpatient settings, increasing the use of remote consultations, and cancelling or postponing non-urgent services during the height of the first wave. In the immediate future, countries will have to continue balancing care for COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 patients to minimize adverse health outcomes, ideally with supporting guidelines and COVID-19-specific care zones. Looking forward, policymakers will have to consider whether strategies adopted during the COVID-19 pandemic will become permanent features of care provision.

Indexed as

COVID-19Ambulatory Care FacilitiesGovernment ProgramsHealth ServicesHumansPandemicsCOVID-19Essential servicesPrioritization of careService delivery

Identifiers

PMID34246501
PMCPMC8093167

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.