Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34246082›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in genetics & development2021

The transcription factor code in iPSC reprogramming.

Weixian Deng, Elsie C Jacobson, Amanda J Collier, Kathrin Plath

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in genetics & development, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. PRDM14 extinction enables the initiation of trophoblast stem cell formation.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2024
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Metabolic control of induced pluripotency.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2023
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Weixian DengDepartment of Biological Chemistry, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA; Molecular Biology Interdepartmental Graduate Program, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
Elsie C JacobsonDepartment of Biological Chemistry, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
Amanda J CollierDepartment of Biological Chemistry, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
Kathrin PlathDepartment of Biological Chemistry, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA; Molecular Biology Interdepartmental Graduate Program, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA; Molecular Biology Institute, Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, Brain Research Institute, Graduate Program in the Biosciences, Eli and Edythe Broad Center of Regenerative Medicine and Stem Cell Research, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA. Electronic address: kplath@mednet.ucla.edu.

Funding

Roles of sumoylation and alternative polyadenylation in cellular reprogrammingP01GM099134 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI PLATH, KATHRIN · 2011 to 2021
$20.3M
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNIGMS NIH HHS P01 GM099134
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transcription factor (TF)-induced reprogramming of somatic cells across lineages and to induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) has revealed a remarkable plasticity of differentiated cells and presents great opportunities for generating clinically relevant cell types for disease modeling and regenerative medicine. The understanding of iPSC reprogramming provides insights into the mechanisms that safeguard somatic cell identity, drive epigenetic reprogramming, and underlie cell fate specification in vivo. The combinatorial action of TFs has emerged as the key mechanism for the direct and indirect effects of reprogramming factors that induce the remodelling of the enhancer landscape. The interplay of TFs in iPSC reprogramming also yields trophectoderm- and extraembryonic endoderm-like cell populations, uncovering an intriguing plasticity of cell states and opening new avenues for exploring cell fate decisions during early embryogenesis.

Indexed as

Cellular ReprogrammingAnimalsEmbryonic DevelopmentEpigenesis, GeneticHumansInduced Pluripotent Stem CellsTranscription FactorsTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID34246082
PMCPMC9469655

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.