Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34246075›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical virology : the official publication of the Pan American Society for Clinical Virology2021

High-sensitivity SARS-CoV-2 group testing by digital PCR among symptomatic patients in hospital settings.

Alexandra Martin, Alexandre Storto, Quentin Le Hingrat, Gilles Collin, Barbara André, Allison Mallory, Rémi Dangla, Diane Descamps, Benoit Visseaux, Olivier Gossner

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical virology : the official publication of the Pan American Society for Clinical Virology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. One-Step RT-qPCR for Viral RNA Detection Using Digital Analysis.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Alexandra MartinStilla Technologies, Villejuif, France.
Alexandre StortoUniversité de Paris, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Service de virologie, Hôpital Bichat, Paris, France; UMR 1137-IAME, DeSCID: Decision Sciences in Infectious Diseases control and care, INSERM, Université de Paris, Paris, France.
Quentin Le HingratUniversité de Paris, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Service de virologie, Hôpital Bichat, Paris, France; UMR 1137-IAME, DeSCID: Decision Sciences in Infectious Diseases control and care, INSERM, Université de Paris, Paris, France.
Gilles CollinUniversité de Paris, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Service de virologie, Hôpital Bichat, Paris, France; UMR 1137-IAME, DeSCID: Decision Sciences in Infectious Diseases control and care, INSERM, Université de Paris, Paris, France.
Barbara AndréStilla Technologies, Villejuif, France.
Allison MalloryStilla Technologies, Villejuif, France.
Rémi DanglaStilla Technologies, Villejuif, France.
Diane DescampsUniversité de Paris, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Service de virologie, Hôpital Bichat, Paris, France; UMR 1137-IAME, DeSCID: Decision Sciences in Infectious Diseases control and care, INSERM, Université de Paris, Paris, France.
Benoit VisseauxUniversité de Paris, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Service de virologie, Hôpital Bichat, Paris, France; UMR 1137-IAME, DeSCID: Decision Sciences in Infectious Diseases control and care, INSERM, Université de Paris, Paris, France. Electronic address: benoit.visseaux@aphp.fr.
Olivier GossnerCNRS- CREST, Ecole Polytechnique, Palaiseau, France and London School of Economics, London, United Kingdom.
Inserm · FRCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWorldwide demand for SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR testing is still high as testing remains central to follow the disease spread and vaccine efficacy. Group testing has been proposed as a solution to expand testing capabilities but sensitivity concerns may limit its impact on the management of the pandemic. Digital PCR (RT-dPCR) has been shown to be highly sensitive and could help by providing larger testing capabilities without compromising sensitivity.

methodsWe implemented RT-dPCR based COVID-19 group testing on a commercially available system and assay (naica® system from Stilla Technologies) and investigated the sensitivity of the method in real life conditions of a university hospital in Paris, France, in May 2020. We tested the protocol in a direct comparison with reference RT-PCR testing on 448 samples split into groups of 8, 16 and 32 samples for RT-dPCR analysis.

resultsIndividual RT-PCR testing identified 25/448 positive samples. Using 56 groups of 8, RT-dPCR identified 23 groups as positive, corresponding to 26 positive samples by individual PCR (positive percentage agreement 95.2% [95% confidence interval: 76.2-99.9%]) and including 2 samples not detected by individual RT-PCR but confirmed positive by further investigation. 15 of 28 groups of 16 tested positive, corresponding to 25 positive samples by individual PCR (positive percentage agreement 87.5% [95% confidence interval: 61.7-98.4%]). 14 groups of 32 were fully concordant with individual PCR testing but will need to be confirmed on larger datasets.

conclusionsOur proposed approach of group testing by digital PCR has similar diagnostic sensitivity compared to individual RT-PCR testing for group up to 16 samples. This approach reduces the quantity of reagent needed by up to 80% while reducing costs and increasing capabilities of testing up to 10-fold.

Indexed as

COVID-19SARS-CoV-2HospitalsHumansPandemicsPolymerase Chain ReactionSensitivity and SpecificityCOVID-19Digital PCRGroup testingRT-PCRSample poolingSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID34246075
PMCPMC8253657
OpenAlexW3179187751

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.