Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34245913›Full record

ReviewJournal of biomedical informatics2021

Searching for scientific evidence in a pandemic: An overview of TREC-COVID.

Kirk Roberts, Tasmeer Alam, Steven Bedrick, Dina Demner-Fushman, Kyle Lo, Ian Soboroff, Ellen Voorhees, Lucy Lu Wang, William R Hersh

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of biomedical informatics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Data science approaches to confronting the COVID-19 pandemic: a narrative review.Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2022
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Kirk RobertsUniversity of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA. Electronic address: kirk.roberts@uth.tmc.edu.
Tasmeer AlamMorgan State University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Steven BedrickOregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
Dina Demner-FushmanUS National Library of Medicine, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Kyle LoAllen Institute for AI, Seattle, WA, USA.
Ian SoboroffNational Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD, USA.
Ellen VoorheesNational Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD, USA.
Lucy Lu WangAllen Institute for AI, Seattle, WA, USA.
William R HershOregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.

Funding

Providing timely and effortless access to reliable health-related information for decision support and educationZIALM010019 · NLM · NATIONAL LIBRARY OF MEDICINE · PI DEMNER-FUSHMAN, DINA · 2021 to 2025
$12.0M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We present an overview of the TREC-COVID Challenge, an information retrieval (IR) shared task to evaluate search on scientific literature related to COVID-19. The goals of TREC-COVID include the construction of a pandemic search test collection and the evaluation of IR methods for COVID-19. The challenge was conducted over five rounds from April to July 2020, with participation from 92 unique teams and 556 individual submissions. A total of 50 topics (sets of related queries) were used in the evaluation, starting at 30 topics for Round 1 and adding 5 new topics per round to target emerging topics at that state of the still-emerging pandemic. This paper provides a comprehensive overview of the structure and results of TREC-COVID. Specifically, the paper provides details on the background, task structure, topic structure, corpus, participation, pooling, assessment, judgments, results, top-performing systems, lessons learned, and benchmark datasets.

Indexed as

COVID-19PandemicsHumansInformation Storage and RetrievalSARS-CoV-2COVID-19Information retrievalPandemicsTREC-COVID

Identifiers

PMID34245913
PMCPMC8264272

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.