Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34245622›Full record

SynthesisReviews in medical virology2022

Hydroxychloroquine in the treatment of coronavirus disease 2019: Rapid updated systematic review and meta-analysis.

Tejpal Gupta, Prafulla Thakkar, Babusha Kalra, Sadhana Kannan

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Reviews in medical virology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Observational
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tejpal GuptaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Clinical Research Centre, Advanced Centre for Treatment Research & Education in Cancer (ACTREC), Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Kharghar, Navi Mumbai, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8256-9206
Prafulla ThakkarDivision of Internal Medicine, Clinical Research Centre, Advanced Centre for Treatment Research & Education in Cancer (ACTREC), Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Kharghar, Navi Mumbai, India.
Babusha KalraDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Clinical Research Centre, Advanced Centre for Treatment Research & Education in Cancer (ACTREC), Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Kharghar, Navi Mumbai, India.
Sadhana KannanClinical Research Secretariat, Clinical Research Centre, Advanced Centre for Treatment Research & Education in Cancer (ACTREC), Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Kharghar, Navi Mumbai, India.
Homi Bhabha National Institute · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by the novel severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 continues to grow and spread throughout the world since being declared a pandemic. Despite extensive scientific research globally including repurposing of several existing drugs, there is no effective or proven therapy for this enigmatic disease which is still largely managed empirically This systematic review evaluated the role of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) in the treatment of COVID-19 infection and was conducted using Cochrane methodology for systematic reviews of interventional studies including risk of bias assessment and grading of the quality of evidence. Only prospective clinical trials randomly assigning COVID-19 patients to HCQ plus standard of care therapy (test arm) versus placebo/standard of care (control arm) were included. Data were pooled using the random-effects model and expressed as risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI). A total of 10,492 patients from 19 randomised controlled trials were included. The use of HCQ was not associated with higher rates of clinical improvement (RR = 1.00, 95% CI: 0.96-1.03, p = 0.79) or reduction in all-cause mortality by Day14 (RR = 1.07, 95% CI: 0.97-1.19, p = 0.19) or Day28 (RR = 1.08, 95% CI: 0.99-1.19, p = 0.09) compared to placebo/standard of care. There was no significant difference in serious adverse events between the two arms (RR = 1.01, 95% CI: 0.85-1.19, p = 0.95). There is low-to-moderate certainty evidence that HCQ therapy is generally safe but does not reduce mortality or enhance recovery in patients with COVID-19 infection.

Indexed as

COVID-19 Drug TreatmentHydroxychloroquineHumansProspective StudiesSARS-CoV-2Hydroxychloroquinecoronavirushydroxychloroquinetoxicity

Identifiers

PMID34245622
PMCPMC8420202
OpenAlexW3180564861

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.