Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34245395›Full record

SynthesisAIDS and behavior2022

Re-Engagement into HIV Care: A Systematic Review.

Natalia Blanco, Marie-Claude C Lavoie, Emily Koech, David J Riedel, Caroline Ngeno, Sylvia Adebajo, Emilie Ludeman, Kristen A Stafford

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in AIDS and behavior, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Natalia Blanco *Ciheb, Institute of Human Virology, School of Medicine, University of Maryland Baltimore, 725 West Lombard Street, Baltimore, MD, 21201, USA. nblanco@ihv.umaryland.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3157-1119
Marie-Claude C Lavoie *Ciheb, Institute of Human Virology, School of Medicine, University of Maryland Baltimore, 725 West Lombard Street, Baltimore, MD, 21201, USA.
Emily KoechCiheb-Kenya, Nairobi, Kenya.
David J RiedelCiheb, Institute of Human Virology, School of Medicine, University of Maryland Baltimore, 725 West Lombard Street, Baltimore, MD, 21201, USA.
Caroline NgenoMaryland Global Initiatives Corporation-Kenya, an affiliate of the University of Maryland, Baltimore, Nairobi, Kenya.
Sylvia AdebajoMaryland Global Initiatives Corporation-Nigeria, an affiliate of the University of Maryland, Baltimore, Abuja, Nigeria.
Emilie LudemanHealth Services and Human Services Library, University of Maryland Baltimore, Baltimore, USA.
Kristen A StaffordCiheb, Institute of Human Virology, School of Medicine, University of Maryland Baltimore, 725 West Lombard Street, Baltimore, MD, 21201, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Identifying evidence-based interventions that can optimize the re-engagement into care of people living with HIV is necessary to achieve and sustain HIV epidemic control. We conducted a systematic review of interventions for re-engagement into HIV care to examine the accumulated evidence and to identify similarities and differences across studies. Between January and March 2020, we searched MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, and PsycINFO databases for publications from 1996 to 2020. We screened 765 references and selected 125 publications for full-text review. For the nine included studies, the intervention centered on (1) integration of clinic and HIV surveillance data; (2) additional or different levels of support provided by healthcare workers; or (3) multi-component intervention. Irrespective of the interventions, mixed results were found for re-engagement into care or ART re-initiation. None of the studies led to an improvement in viral suppression. Re-engagement in HIV care is critical for longitudinal HIV and national program success. Standardizing definitions for out-of-care and re-engagement would facilitate the comparison of interventions. Rigorous study designs to assess strategies to enhance HIV re-engagement are warranted.

Indexed as

EpidemicsHIV InfectionsDelivery of Health CareHealth PersonnelHumansART re-initiationHIVOut-of-careRe-engagement into care

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.