ArticleJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2022
The prognostic role of radiotherapy and radiotherapy target in cervical lymph node metastatic squamous cell carcinoma with unknown primary: a retrospective study.
Article in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Breaking New Ground in Cervical Metastatic Carcinoma of Unknown Primary: Neoadjuvant Immunochemotherapy's Pathologic Regression and Survival Advantage.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Head and Neck Cancer of Unknown Primary: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort study in Northern Thailand, an Endemic Nasopharyngeal Cancer Area.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesAim to analyze the effect of radiotherapy for cervical lymph node metastatic carcinoma with unknown primary (CCUP) and compare the survival benefits between Comprehensive radiotherapy and Involved Field radiotherapy. MATERIALS AND
methodsThe patients diagnosed with CCUP between 2009 and 2019 in our institution were analyzed retrospectively. The categorical variables were tested by χ
resultsOf 139 patients, 64.7% (90/139) of them received radiotherapy. Of the 90 patients who underwent radiotherapy, 45.6% (41/90) received Involved Field radiotherapy and the rest 49 patients received Comprehensive radiotherapy. The median follow-up of 139 patients is 69 months. The 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year OS rates are 87%, 62%, and 39%, respectively, and the DFS rates are 73%, 45%, and 29%, respectively. Multivariate analysis of 139 patients with CCUP shows that differentiation grade, N stage, radiotherapy, and the length of the largest lymph node (D
conclusionRadiotherapy is the independent prognostic factor for CCUP. Comprehensive radiotherapy may be superior to Involved Field radiotherapy in survival benefits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.