ReviewJournal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996)2021
Electrophysiological biomarkers for deep brain stimulation outcomes in movement disorders: state of the art and future challenges.
Review in Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Local Field Aperiodic Spectral Power Modulated by Deep Brain Stimulation in Parkinson's Disease.Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society · 2026Article
- The Place of Local Field Potentials in Deep Brain Stimulation Programming for Parkinson's Disease: A Review.Brain sciences · 2025Review
- Robust In Vitro Models for Studying Parkinson's Disease? LUHMES Cells and SH-SH5Y Cells.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- The effect of deep brain stimulation in Parkinson's disease reflected in EEG microstates.NPJ Parkinson's disease · 2023Article
- Electroencephalogram (EEG) With or Without Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) as Biomarkers for Post-stroke Recovery: A Narrative Review.Frontiers in neurology · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Several neurological diseases are accompanied by rhythmic oscillatory dysfunctions in various frequency ranges and disturbed cross-frequency relationships on regional, interregional, and whole brain levels. Knowledge of these disease-specific oscillopathies is important mainly in the context of deep brain stimulation (DBS) therapy. Electrophysiological biomarkers have been used as input signals for adaptive DBS (aDBS) as well as preoperative outcome predictors. As movement disorders, particularly Parkinson's disease (PD), are among the most frequent DBS indications, the current research of DBS is the most advanced in the movement disorders field. We reviewed the literature published mainly between 2010 and 2020 to identify the most important findings concerning the current evolution of electrophysiological biomarkers in DBS and to address future challenges for prospective research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34245367What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.