Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34245343›Full record

ArticleOsteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA2021

Survival bias may explain the appearance of the obesity paradox in hip fracture patients.

R M Amin, M Raad, S S Rao, F Musharbash, M J Best, D F Amanatullah

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. The impact of body mass index on mortality rates of hip fracture patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2022
    Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Obesity classification predicts early complications and mortality after acetabular fracture.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

R M AminDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford Medicine University, 450 Broadway Street, Redwood City, CA, 94063, USA.
M RaadDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
S S RaoDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
F MusharbashDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
M J BestDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
D F AmanatullahDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford Medicine University, 450 Broadway Street, Redwood City, CA, 94063, USA. DFA@stanford.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6203-5853
Johns Hopkins University · USStanford Medicine · US

Funding

Institutional Career Development Core (KL2)KL2TR003143 · NCATS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI ASCH, STEVEN M. · 2019 to 2023
$8.7M
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR003143
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patients with low-energy hip fractures do not follow the obesity paradox as previously reported. In datasets where injury mechanism is not available, the use of age >50 years (as opposed to commonly used >65 years) as a surrogate for a low-energy hip fracture patients may be a more robust inclusion criterion.  PURPOSE: In elderly patients with a hip fracture, limited data suggests that obese patients counterintuitively have improved survival compared to normal-weight patients. This "obesity paradox" may be the byproduct of selection bias. We hypothesized that the obesity paradox would not apply to elderly hip fracture patients.

methodsThe National Surgical Quality Improvement Project dataset identified 71,685 hip fracture patients ≥50 years-of-age with complete body mass index (BMI) data that underwent surgery. Patients were stratified into under and over 75-year-old cohorts (n=18,956 and 52,729, respectively). Within each age group, patients were stratified by BMI class and compared with respect to preoperative characteristics and 30-day mortality. Significant univariate characteristics (p<0.1) were included in multivariate analysis to determine the independent effect of obesity class on 30-day mortality (p<0.05).

resultsMultivariate analysis of <75-year-old patients with class-III obesity were more likely to die within 30-days than similarly aged normal-weight patients (OR 1.91, CI 1.06-3.42, p=0.030). Multivariate analysis of ≥75-year-old overweight (OR 0.69, CI 0.62-0.77, p<0.001), class-I obese (OR 0.62, CI 0.51-0.74, p<0.001), or class-II obese (OR=0.69, CI 0.50-0.95, p=0.022) patients were less likely to die within 30-days when compared to similarly aged normal-weight patients.

conclusionsOur data suggest that obesity is a risk factor for mortality in low-energy hip fracture patients, but the appearance of the "obesity paradox" in elderly hip fracture patients results from statistical bias that is only evident upon subgroup analysis.

Indexed as

Hip FracturesAgedBiasBody Mass IndexHumansMiddle AgedObesityOverweightRisk FactorsHip fractureMortalityObesityObesity paradoxRisk factor

Identifiers

PMID34245343
PMCPMC8819709
OpenAlexW3177939100

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.